My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 06161981
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1981
>
PL MINUTES 06161981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:22:42 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 06161981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Before making a motion, Mr. Jones said his. .opinions regarding the <br /> utilization of front yards are well known and, "other communities <br /> have recognized there is more value in using back yards for re- <br /> creation, etc. , than for buildings" , but also pointed out, that <br /> Mr.. Danelski' s addition "will still be more than 30 feet from the <br /> roadway, and, even if the sidewalk were constructed, would be 25 <br /> feet from the edge of that sidewalk" . <br /> Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded by Mr. Bowerman to recommend the <br /> City Council grant a 12 foot sideyard setback variance to James <br /> Danelski to permit him to remodel his existing home at 3301 Croft <br /> Drive, as proposed in Site Plan A, finding that granting this <br /> variance will : 1) Relieve an undue hardship caused by the very wide <br /> setback held for right-of-way- along -33rd Avenue N.E. , which will <br /> probably never be used, and must be maintained by the homeowner; <br /> 2) The proposed .addition is the best possible way for the homeowner <br /> to provide additional living space for his family and, at the same <br /> time, maintain the high quality of construction of this neighborhood <br /> and the existing dwelling; 3) Low energy. costs when the City ordin- <br /> ances were drafted .and this property was developed, did not take <br /> into consideration that energy conservation would become a necessity <br /> and that this proposal, using passive solar energy, would best meet <br /> the needs of the homeowner, the neighborhood and the City; and 4) <br /> A petition of support has been signed by Mr. Danelski' s neighbors <br /> and no opposition was demonstrated at either of two hearings. <br /> Before voting, the Chairman commented that he viewed the divergence <br /> of opinion on the Commission as indicating all sectors of the City ' s <br /> population are represented on that body. He added that he personally <br /> • agrees with an opinion expressed by Mr. Sopcinski at another meeting, <br /> that "many of the early residents had moved to St.. Anthony because <br /> they wanted elbow room" . He questioned whether such "elbow room" <br /> will be provided if front yards are built up. Mr. Bowerman said <br /> he believed this proposal "leaves plenty of elbow room".. <br /> Mr. Peterson called the question, but only the Chairman voted to <br /> close off the discussion. <br /> Mr. Enrooth said his home on 33rd .Avenue is closer to the street <br /> than Mr. Danelski ' s will be with the addition. <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Jones, Bowerman and Enrooth. <br /> Nay: Peterson, Bjorklund and Makowske. <br /> Motion not carried. <br /> Motion by Mr. Enrooth and seconded by Mr. Bjorklund to continue the <br /> agenda. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> • In his June 12th report to the Commission, Mr. Berg reported results <br /> of research he had done regarding several Commission members ' con- <br /> cerns about signage on Silver Lake Road and the Columbia Heights <br /> Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Bowerman said he did not agree with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.