My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 08181981
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1981
>
PL MINUTES 08181981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:22:31 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:22:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 08181981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-4- <br /> Mrs. Dorumsgaard asked how the City could integrate the density <br /> considered feasible for the Walbon property with the expensive homes <br /> in that area, and questioned whether the City was "being pressured by <br /> other governmental agencies to provide moderate income housing which <br /> she believes will adversely affect the valuation of her home. Mr. <br /> Jones indicated, although he knows the Metropolitan Council is recom- <br /> mending building codes be relaxed to allow more affordable housing, <br /> he believes the City is in substantial compliance with the number of <br /> low income to middle income families who are housed in the. apartment <br /> buildings in the northern section of the community. When Mrs. Dorumsgaard <br /> asked the Commission members to speculate as to what a -real estate <br /> appraiser would tell her about the effect she could expect on her <br /> home valuation if the density proposed is permitted, the Chairman <br /> told her, as an appraiser, he believes she would be told that unless <br /> the project was developed with adequate barriers and in an attractive <br /> manner, her property value might well be lowered. She was also <br /> reminded that if the City does nothing about the Walbon property, <br /> any enterprise which has existed on the site, including production of <br /> gravel and blacktop, excavating, trucking, and -even a restaurant and <br /> a filling station, might legally be repeated by the Walbons . <br /> Robert Williams, 3125 Croft Drive, (lot 4) who lives on the south side <br /> of the Walbon property, said he will be inclined to oppose any develop- <br /> ment which exceeds an R-1 zoning because he sees increasing the density <br /> will significantly affect the quality of the .neighborhood, principally <br /> as related to the noise and traffic which will be generated. His <br /> main objection -to the Walbon-' s existing usage is the noise generated <br /> by refrigerator trucks which are left running all night.. Mr. Dougherty <br /> • recalled that when he was on the Council the Walbon property had <br /> been considered for single family development and with the necessary <br /> cul de sac, estimated only five or six homes could be built on that <br /> site. When Mrs: Dorumsgaard was asked what her reaction was to� the <br /> Executive Manor, which is only 300 feet from her property, where units <br /> are priced from $50 , 000 to $60 ,000. She pointed out the ample grassy <br /> areas around the building and said the parking is all located on the <br /> highway away from the adjoining single family dwellings . She then <br /> cited the Fudali townhouses - which sold for as much as $100 ,000 before <br /> they were ever built, which she believes were constructed in an <br /> attractive manner. <br /> Councilman Ranallo told Mrs . Dorumsgaard the City' s HRA was spearheaded <br /> for the Kenzie Terrace revitalization but was intended to provide a <br /> redevelopment tool anywhere in the City. <br /> The hearing was closed at 9 :50 P.M. after the Chairman -had assured the <br /> residents present that no action was to be taken that evening and their <br /> comments would be very helpful to both the Commission and Council <br /> in making a determination. <br /> Mr. Enrooth indicated he did not believe the Commission had sufficient <br /> information to make an informed decision regarding a recommendation <br /> at this time. <br /> Mr. Peterson commented that, although he perceived the residents might <br /> have been confused regarding the purpose of the hearing and the develop- <br /> ment itself, he believed their perspectives might change if an - <br /> attractive development were offered. However, he doubted whether they <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.