PL MINUTES 07201982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- Neither Mr: Hedlund. nor Mr. Morris were in attendance and no one else appeared to speak either for or against the land transfer. • Mr. Jones questioned whether the fence would not -have to be constructed on Mr. . Hedlund' s property in the manner in which it was specified in the Hedlund PUD. He reminded-'-the Commission that the PUD originally called for an eight. foo.t high redwood. fence which was designed to screen the single family homes on Penrod from the commercial development approved for the Silver Lake Road portion of the site. He said he personally believes the proposed .fence should be built with .slats to assure the 80 percent opacity required by the PUD. The hearing was recessed from 8 :00 P.M.. to 8 : 12 P.M. so Mr. Berg could research previous references tothe fence and whether or' not the fence should be slatted. When the hearing was resumed , Mr. Bowerman indicated .he be.lieved the discussion should be confined to consideration of the land transfer and Mr. Jones agreed that staff should handle the fence matter. The public hearingwas closed at 8:21 P .M. Motion by Por. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr. Peterson to recommend Council .approval of the subdivision .without platting .of a 12 foot strip of land described as the east 12 feet of Lot 11 , Block 1, Penrod Addi- tion, as requested by Hedlund, Lee, et al, from the .property currently known as 3909 -Si.lver Lake Road to that at 3904 Penrod Lane , as long as the transfer in no way affects the Hedlund PUD requirements , specifically • those related to fencing, landscaping and parking. The Planning Commission bases its recommendation of approval on the findings that: (1) There was no public opposition demonstrated against the transfer. (2) The transfer is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the abutting properties .and would not be considered to in any way diminish the conditions set by the PUD. (3) The existing large oak tree on the site would probably be saved with the transfer. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Lee told the Commission he is still concerned with the type of fence which may go in between his property and the hair styling shop, if he doesn ' t build it himself. He believes the fence he proposed to build would be far superior to those built north of him on Penrod by Mr. Brickner,, and that the landscaping required by the PUD for the rear of the property at 3909. Silver Lake Road should provide adequate opacity . At 8: 32 P.11. , the public hearing on the _Midland Park Addition plat was opened with the Chairman reading the notice of the hearing which had gone out to all property owners within 350 feet of the site in the • office park. No one appeared to speak either for or against the proposal and it was agreed the discussion should be deferred until later in the meeting when the parties involved in the request might show up.