PL MINUTES 10051982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

=3- (,2) The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental .to the health , - :saf:ety,, or =genera-L-we_lfare of persons residing or work- ing in the vicinity or injurious to property values or improve- ments in the vicinity. (3) The proposed conditional use .is necessary or desirable at the above . location to provide .a service .or a facility which is in the interest of the public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare ofthe neighborhood or community. (A) There was no opposition to the proposal demonstrated during the hearing. (5) Granting this permit would .seem to be helpful to the economic welfare of Apache. , (.6) It appears an undue hardship would be caused the applicants if this permit for the drive-in- facility were not granted because they have indicated this activity accounts for 25 percent of their business . (7) The Apache management has indicated siting the restaurant in this location would not interfere with any road or traffic pattern improvements they plan for the area in the future. Motion. carried unanimously. • At 8 : 35 P .M. , the Chairman opened the second hearing on .the proposal which was related to the Zantigo request for a -variance from the City ordinance requirement that 52parking spaces be -provided for drive- in restaurants of this size and type which would allow Zantigo KFC to provide only 34 such spaces , or eighteen less than required. Chairman Jones read the portion of the notice which pertained to this aspect of the request and no one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its contents . Mr. Berg explained he had figured. 31 parking spaces would be required for the building -itself, 13 for the restaurant aspect and 8 for the number of employees which are anticipated. Mr. Shavlis said no more than 25. parking spaces have been required for any restaurant they own because of the nature of their business but they had increased this number to 34 which they believe should be more . than . adequate with the parking .which would be available .to them in the adjacent shopping center lots . Mr. Cavanaugh said although there is no written agreement with - Zantigo to the effect that such parking would be available to them, there are no plans to develop any further the space west of. the restaurant because of problems with visibility. The only other free standing building the shopping center management would'- even -consider might be south of the Midwest .Federal Bank build- ing, and even that site might cause visibility problems for the mall tenants . • The Rein executive said it is estimated 250 cars used the western parking lots near Montgomery Wards and there .is no reason to believe