Laserfiche WebLink
' - 2 - <br /> they could be certain the total length of the sanctuary would <br /> eace,.ed— 77 feet. Mr . Jones said the architect would be <br /> • g up-_.t-he landscaping plans. . to improve the slope of the land <br /> and to prevent water runoff on the abutting neighbors ' properties <br /> which would be presented for neighbor approval sometime in the <br /> spring . He hoped these plantings could be worked into the existing <br /> shrubberies which now separate the church parking lots from the <br /> adjacent park property north of the existing church structure-. <br /> The church spokesperson indicated he believes "the church is now <br /> on good terms with its neighbors ." <br /> Larry and Sandy Antczak whose property at 3501 36th Avenue. N.E. , <br /> was the most affected by the proposed addition, were present and <br /> Mr. Antczak told the Commission members that although he was not <br /> altogether happy to have the sanctuary extended i5 feet further <br /> toward his property, he and his wife had been willing to compromise <br /> that point to get that addition reduced and the other addition <br /> moved back, but he was still concerned that the overhang on the <br /> proposed addition not be more than ten inches to alleviate the <br /> runoff on his. property.. Mr . Jones said he would instruct the <br /> architect to make these changes to the extent they are feasible. <br /> Both Mr. Antczak and Donald Esau, 3505 36th Avenue. N.E. thanked <br /> the Planning Commission and Council for understanding their <br /> concerns about the first proposal made by the church which they <br /> believed would have adversely affected their use o.f' their own <br /> backyards . Although he still believed the sanctuary extension to <br /> be, app opriate , Mr. Esau said he would support qtr. Antczak' s <br /> acceptance of that extension as long as the landscaping is pro- <br /> vided as agreed to by the church officials. He reiterated that <br /> he appreciated the Mayor' s efforts and the time spent by both <br /> Council and Commission which had ultimately led to .the resolution <br /> of differences between the parties and Mr . Esau indicated he per- <br /> ceived this was an instance where "the democratic process had <br /> certainly worked" , and he' believed the channels of communication <br /> had been opened to such an extent that the church and neighbors <br /> would be able to work out any future problems without coming to <br /> the Council . <br /> Reverend Joseph 0. Valtinson,' the Elmwood pastor, told the <br /> Commission members he believed he "had been blessed by having <br /> the conflicts resolved in a .friendly manner , since after all , <br /> that is the church' s purpose." <br /> Erling Weiberg, 3409 36th Avenue N.E. , who had presented the con- <br /> cerns of the neighbors from the first hearing , attributed the <br /> utilization of the "good offices of the Mayor" as a deciding fac- <br /> tor in "getting the job done" , especially his insistence that a <br /> neutral party (the Manager) chair the final discussion between <br /> the church and neighbors . The Chair Pro Tem agreed that Mr. <br /> Childs ' presence during the negotiations and the fact that all <br /> the participants had come into the negotiations with open minds , <br /> ad made the final resolution of differences possible. <br />