My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 05151984
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1984
>
PL MINUTES 05151984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:04:49 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:04:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1984
SP Name
PL MINUTES 05151984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 2 - <br /> 1 Commissioner Bjorklund other KFC restaurants with a seating of 40 would normally <br /> • 2 have between 16 to 20 parking spaces provided. Because they just lease the land, <br /> 3 Mr. Ozga said he wasn't sure whether there was any provision for shared parking <br /> 4 spaces in the center. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Glen Gavick, 2605 1 owry Avenue N.E., whose property abuts the grassy strip which <br /> 7 separates his side yard and the existing parking area indicated he would strongly <br /> 8 oppose the removal of that strip and "putting cars almost into my front room". <br /> 9 He told of the problems he experiences now with parked cars with radios blasting <br /> 10 and of the litter from the restaurant which blows onto his lawn. He said the <br /> 11 restaurant was there when he built his home, but wouldn't want the parking any <br /> 12 closer than it is now. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Mr. Gavick said he had come not to make trouble for the restaurant owners, but <br /> 15 just to see 'if something couldn't be worked out. to. reduce the annoyances he <br /> 16 experiences. He showed on the blackboard just where his house was situated in <br /> 17 relation to the restaurant and told the Commissioners that he had put in the <br /> 18 fence and shrubbery which partially shield his home from the restaurant activities. <br /> 19 The homeowner indicated he had mowed the grass strip for the last seven years and <br /> 20 intended to.continue to do so in the future. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Mr. Ozga responded by saying the restaurant owners were most anxious to have a <br /> 23 good relationship with ,the-neighbors and would be willing to leave the green <br /> 24 strip and modify their parking plans, if necessary. He also said KFC would be <br /> 25 cleaning up the restaurant grounds and would be putting up a fence to protect <br /> 26 the neighbor's properties. Mr. Gavick responded by _saying, "Sounds good to me". <br /> • 27 <br /> 28 The hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. for Commission consideration of a recommenda- <br /> 29 tion to the Council. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 It was noted that other neighbors had consistently parked their family vehicles <br /> 32 on the restaurant property and a fence might free up that space for restaurant <br /> 33 parking. Mr. Ozga told Commissioner Franzese the yard light indicated on the <br /> 34 site plans would be directed downward and would not illuminate the adjacent <br /> 35 properties and are on an automatic timer. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Bowerman to recommend <br /> 38 the Council grant a conditional use permit to KFC, Inc. which would allow them <br /> 39 to make the exterior and landscaping improvements, including the addition.of a <br /> 40 7 foot by 16 foot, 8 inch front vestibule to their existing restaurant as proposed <br /> 41 in the site and landscaping plans presented at the May 15, 1984 hearing on their <br /> 42 proposal , contingent upon their constructing a substantial , opaque 5 or 6 foot <br /> 43 fence along the east boundary of- their property and along the rear lot line to <br /> 44 connect with an existing fence, in the rear and to the rear of their building. . <br /> 45 The Commission further directs that the permit should be made contingent upon <br /> 46 the i.nformation staff is able to research regarding a possible parking variance <br /> 47 when the building was originally approved and the approval of the construction <br /> 48 plans by the land owner of the shopping center where the restaurant is located. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 In recommending approval of the permit the Commission finds that: <br /> 51 <br /> • <br /> 52 1. Granting the permit would reduce the existing nuisance to the adjacent single <br /> 53 family properties in the forms of noise, litter, view and casual parking. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 2. No opposition was expressed to the motion,. as developed, from the adjacent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.