My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 08211984
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1984
>
PL MINUTES 08211984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:04:24 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:04:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1984
SP Name
PL MINUTES 08211984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> • 1 said was especially true of truck drivers who can't make the turn. As a remedy, <br /> 2 the Association is considering putting up small "private" .signs on both entrances <br /> 3 and putting up temporary barricades to educate the drivers that the driveway is <br /> 4 not part of the City's road system. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 When Commissioner Franzese asked :Mr. Krumm whether.the proposed sign would fulfill <br /> 7 its purpose of identifying the development, he responded, "It 's better than no <br /> 8 sign at all . " <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Commissioner Bjorklund referred the Association President to the discussion they <br /> 11 had during the June meeting as to whether the use of "Court" might add to the <br /> 12 driver's confusion regarding the driveway. Mr. Krumm said the Association members <br /> 13 were of the opinion they would lose their identity if they called themselves the <br /> 14 "St. Anthony Townhomes" since there are so many of that particular types of housing <br /> 15 in the City. When the Commi.ssioner asked the townhome representative whether he <br /> 16 construed his sign would be the sign permitted for the Hedlund PUD, the response <br /> 17 was they considered it to be "the sign for the- St. Anthony Court". <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Craig Morris, whose sign for Craig & Company had. been. a point of controversy over <br /> 20 the years, was present and had requested his signage be considered along with the <br /> 21 townhome signage, since both signs were affected by the same PUD. In his memorandum, <br /> 22 -Mr. Childs had suggested the Commission take some course of action regarding the <br /> 23 condition of Mr. Morris 's sign since the storm April 26th, but Commissioner <br /> 24 Bjork]:und indicated he perceived that direction- had already been given on Page 9 <br /> 25 of the June 19th Commission minutes. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Hansen to recommend <br /> 28 the Council grant -the necessary variance to the Sign Ordinance to permit the <br /> 29 St. Anthony .Court Homeowners Association- to erect on their property along Silver <br /> 30 Lake Road the free standing monument type sign proposed in the Pine Cone Nursery <br /> 31 site plans submitted for such a sign June 19th and the sketch of the signage which <br /> 32 had been included in the August 21st agenda packet; contingent upon the sign 's <br /> 33 overall height not exceeding 60 inches from the brick base grade, and that all <br /> 34 setbacks frons'the right-of-ways be maintained as proposed by Chester Krumm. The <br /> 35 Commission finds that the proposed sign would conform to the type of signage per- <br /> 36 mitted in the Sign Ordinance for which the precedent has been set throughout the <br /> 37 City; meets the general quality and design criteria set for such signage; and has <br /> 38 taken into consideration the fact that there was no opposition to the request <br /> 39 expressed during any of the hearings on the matter. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 42 <br /> 43___At 7:53 the hearing was opened to consider a petition from Robbie G. Nelson for a <br /> 44 variance to allow construction of an additional--6-feet onto the south side of the <br /> 45 garage located at 3420 Harding Street N.E. , which would permit the garage to be <br /> 46 built within 3 feet 8 inches of the south property line, where 5 feet are required <br /> 47 in the City Ordinance. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Chairman Zawislak read the notice which had been published in the Bulletin, August 8th, <br /> 50 and which had been sent to all property owners of .record within 200 feet of the <br /> 5 1 subject property. No one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected <br /> 52 to its content. Mr. Childs reported receiving no calls either for or against the <br /> 53. proposal <br /> 54' <br /> 55 The applicant and his wife were-present for the discussion as were Mr. and Mrs. <br /> 56;' Earl B. Pearson who live south of the Nelson property at 3420 Harding Street N.E. , <br /> 57 whose opposition was expressed by Mrs. Pearson. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.