My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 02191985
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1985
>
PL MINUTES 02191985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:00:28 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1985
SP Name
PL MINUTES 02191985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-12- <br /> 1 In making these recommendations, the Planning Commission finds there was no <br /> 2 opposition to any of these changes expressed during the hearing. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Voting on the motion: <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Aye: Wagner, Bowerman, Hansen, Franzese, and Madden. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Nay: . Bjorkl und. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Motion carried. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 The Manager then informed the .Commission members that the decision of whether or <br /> 13 not to plat the property had not yet been' made, but the process would not require <br /> 14 a hearing in any event.. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 The Manager sent around the brochure for the APA annual planning conference in <br /> 17 Montreal in April . <br /> 18 <br /> 19 When staff was asked the status on the Capital Improvement. Plan, Mr. Childs said <br /> 20 the Council is planning a city-wide meeting-with the residents in April , where the <br /> 21 Mayor, Council ,members, and Department Heads would be available to discuss City <br /> 22 concerns such as street improvements, the liquor operation, and future housing for <br /> 23 the liquor operation and City offices. He said he would anticipate the Planning <br /> 24 Commission would become involved with the task forces he would anticipate would <br /> 25 evolve from the meeting. <br /> 26 <br /> • <br /> 27 Commissioner Bowerman expressed concern with the way the Planning Commission minutes <br /> 2.8 are reported to the 'Council . He said it had' always been his impression that the <br /> 29 Commission representative was to confine the report only to what the Commission <br /> 30 as a whole voted on and other remarks should be identified as personal conclusions <br /> 31 of that particular Commissioner and not given within the context of a Commission <br /> 32 report. Commissioner. Bjorklund agreed that the direction had always been that the <br /> 33 Commission representative should only read the motions and answer questions and <br /> 34 not give personal views about what the rest of the Commission thought about an <br /> 35 issue. However, he indicated that the last time he had represented the Commission <br /> 36 he had been asked many questions about the Commission's minutes. The Manager said <br /> 37 he perceived the Council felt that the 'Commission minutes were always very complete <br /> 38 in reflecting the actions of the Commission. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Motion by Commissioner Madden and seconded by Commissioner Wagner to adjourn the <br /> 41 meeting at 10:20 P.M. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Respectfully submitted, <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Helen Crowe, Secretary <br /> 48 <br /> 49 <br /> 50 <br /> 51 <br /> • 52 <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.