PL MINUTES 08201985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-3- 1 signage for the building .would be uniform with a letter sign identifying the • 2 building as the Northgate Office Park to be constructed across the front and each 3 unit owner, with the exception of the tanning facility, to be identified on each 4 pillar with a smoked glass identifier_ . That sign would be the only one which 5 would be different since it would be p laced on the east side of the building 6 facing Highway 88 at the entrance to the park. 'Mr. Isaacs said he had stuck 7 to the uniform signage policy in spite of pressure from prospective buyers like 8 beauty shop owners who wanted ,to put bigsigns up on the front of their units 9 and the developer told the Commissioners 'he was certain the City would be very 10 pleased with the end product once it is completed. 11 12 There was no one present who indicated opposition -to the permit and the hearing 13 was closed at 7:50 P.M. 14 15 Commissioner Madden started to make .a recommendation -of approval for the request, 16 but when Commissi-oner 'Bjorklund suggested several changes, the Commissioner with- 17 drew his motion in favor of the other Commissioners ' . 18 19 Motion by Commissioner Bjor klund and seconded by Commissioner Hansen to recommend 20 the Council grant a conditional- use.permit to ,P.E.J. ,Inc. ,. 104 Metro Square 21 Building, St. Paul , under the City ordinance amendment which would allow the 22 operation of -a body sun tanning f acil'ity in .unit #19, Condominium #535 in the 23 Northgate Office Park at 2526 Highway 88, subject to annual review of the permit 24 and to the facility meeting all applicable City, State, and Federal Codes. 25 26 In recommending approval , the Planning Commission finds that: • 27 28 1 . No one appeared- at the Commission hear:ing .or contacted staff prior to the 29 hearing to object to the permit; 30 31 2. The proposed service seems to. fit in with other types of service in that 32 commercial district; and 33 34 3. No problems or complaints about similar operations in St. Anthony have been 35 reported. 36 37 Motion carried unanimously. 38 39 The Commission next considered -the final platting for the Hertog Floral Addition. 40 41 Mr. Childs said he believed all the Commissionconcerns regarding the utility and 42 drainage easements had been..addressed in the plat included in their agenda packet. 4 3 He also said NSP had been ;able to put all electrical lines underground unlike 44 the Johnson project north of this one which had the existing feeder lines which 45 would not be feasible to replace. 46 47 Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Wagner to recommend 48 Council approval of the finalplatting for the Hertog Floral Addition,-,-a seven . 49 lot subdivision between 33rd and 32nd Avenues N.,E. , east of Edward Street, as 50 presented in the final plat for the project. 51 52 In recommending approval of the final platting, the Commission finds that: i 53 54 1 . Both the Commission and Council had held public hearings on the preliminary 55 platting;