My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 08201985
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1985
>
PL MINUTES 08201985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:59:46 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:59:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1985
SP Name
PL MINUTES 08201985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 on their requests. and whether the same policy should apply to both variance and <br /> • 2 conditional use permit applications. She said she personally agreed with the <br /> 3 policy as stated, but also concurred that current Commission members should have <br /> 4 an opportunity to provide input towards any policy. which had been stated to be <br /> 5 coming from the Planning Commission. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Commissioner Madden restated his .posit.i=on that he, as a current Planning Commission <br /> 8 member, should not have to accept a policy .he had'.not participated in making, but <br /> g indicated he was not suggesting the policy itself: shoul.d. be changed. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Commissioner Wagner said he also had 'never participated in the formation of the <br /> 12 policy, but he certainly concurred with it. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Commissioner Hansen.wondered if the word "automatically" should be deleted from <br /> 15 the letter and the letter instead indicate that denial could -be an option which <br /> 16 could be pursued if the applicant failed to make an-appearance. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 The Chair said she could just hear' Commissioner Bowerman saying he perceived the <br /> 19 Commission members were'a voluntary body who were giving. of their time and that <br /> 20 anyone who wanted a variance or a conditional use permit granted should at least <br /> 21 be willing to attend the hearing on his request so the Planning Commission wouldn 't <br /> 22 have to second guess the applicant' s intentions. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 A straw vote was taken of the Commission members of. whether the same letter as <br /> 25 appeared in the Commission' s August 20th agenda packet should be sent to each <br /> 26 applicant for either 'a variance or conditional use permit and passed unanimously <br /> • <br /> 27 in favor, of retaining the same wordage in, all future letters. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Commissioner Bjorklund said- he was disappointed the Manager had to leave before <br /> 30 giving him the information he had requested regarding the tenure of each Com- <br /> 31 mission appointment. He said he was certain. that his own term was up this year <br /> 32 and indicated he would not be serving another term. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 An informal discussion ensued regarding the- type-of signage which might be pro- <br /> 5 posed for the tanning facility., which had been acted .upon earlier that evening. <br /> 3 <br /> 35 Although the discussion itself was deemed ."off the cuff", the Chair requested the <br /> 3 7 secretary to record in .the minutes that the Commission perception had been that <br /> 38 "it would not be automatic that signage would be allowed this business on the <br /> 39` Highway '88 side of the office condo building". <br /> 41 Commissioner Bjorklund will report the minutes of the meeting to the Council at <br /> 42 their August 27th meeting. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Madden to adjourn <br /> 45 the meeting at 9:10 P.M. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Motion carried unanimously: <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Respectfully submitted, <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Helen Crowe, Secretary <br /> • 52 <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.