Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> 1 Mr. Childs said he was not acting as a spokesman for the bank' s position, but <br /> 2 indicated he perceived there might be a difference between granting a sign for a <br /> 3 building which had no lit signs on. it, and for a grocery store, which already has <br /> 4 big red letters lit up to advertise their business. He said he understood the <br /> 5 bank had requested only a sign which architecturally would be of such a size that <br /> 6 it could be positioned close to the building where it would be the least detri- <br /> 7 mental to the overall appearance of the bank itself. Mr. Childs said he perceived <br /> g the bank's thinking had been that the City had already allowed TCF a much larger <br /> 9 sign to advertise the availability of. a 24 hour instant cash machine inside the <br /> 10 building, and to the Manager's way of thinking, the entire Midwest'Federal building <br /> 11 could be perceived to be a sign in itself which presented its own signage type <br /> 12 image just by its appearance (-tree shape) . The Manager also indicated he perceived <br /> 13 the bank had not tried to create an image like a McDonalds or Kentucky Fried . <br /> 14 Chicken for itself, but instead, had designed a sign they believed would fit <br /> 15 well into that neighborhood. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Commissioner Bjorklund told the Manager his comments, especially about the signage <br /> 18 image of Midwest Federal , which is uncommon for other financial institutions in <br /> 19 the City, had caused him to make a complete turnaround in his thinking related <br /> 20 to the requested signage. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Mr. Helgemo -responded to the presumption that instant cash service had become a <br /> 23 common part of the financial service all banks now offer, by saying not all net- <br /> 24 works are connected to Cirrus and the requested sign would be necessary to let <br /> 25 others than the bank's regular customers, who would know, that -their Cirrus bank <br /> 26 cards could be used at St. Anthony National Bank's automatic teller machine. <br /> • <br /> 27 The bank representative also stated that; considering what it costs to install <br /> 28 one of these signs,- he would doubt the City would see too many machines like it <br /> 29 popping up all over St. Anthony. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Commissioner Bowerman said he could appreciate both sides of the issue and indica- <br /> 32 ted his own impulses towards a decision were divided 50/50, because he certainly <br /> 33 recognized that the bank was an asset to the City because of the way they had <br /> 34 conducted business- and cooperated with the City over the years. However, the <br /> 35 Commissioner added, he still had not been convinced that, by granting the request, <br /> 36 a precedent might be established which could cause a loss of control over the <br /> 37 amenities of signage the City might want to retain for the new developments being <br /> 38 considered now, just. a short distance away down Kenzie Terrace. He was still <br /> 39 concerned that the practice. of permitting second free standing signs would be <br /> 40 established and, Commissioner Bowerman commented, he .did not perceive it to be <br /> 41 beyond the realm of reality that there might be a merchant like Lunds, who would <br /> 42 be willing to make the required investment in an ATM machine and thus request a <br /> 43 sim`il-ar 'sa'gn,.,ieCommissioner Wagner indicated that he perceived that a sign like the <br /> 44 bank is requesting, which is very low and recessed far back on the property, almost <br /> 45 on the building itself, could never be equated with a street sign. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he now had been convinced that there had been <br /> 4 g similar requests from other financial lending institutions in the City which had <br /> 49 been granted, and he said that although he disliked approving what could be con- <br /> 50 sidered as a precedent setting variance, , he saw there might be a possibility of <br /> 51 couching the language of a recommendation for approval in such a way that the <br /> 52 uniqueness of the circumstances surrounding this particular sign could be brought <br /> 53 out especially because the resultant sign would be so inoffensive as to its height <br /> 54 and its location on the property. <br /> 55 <br />