Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> • 1 to happen, because he perceived more than a 75% change would be involved, another <br /> 2 hearing would have to be held with advance notification of the same neighbors <br /> 3- about the second issue to be addressed. The Commissioner then suggested that, <br /> 4 if the applicant were willing to compromise by moving the pumps at least four <br /> 5 feet towards the station, he, in turn, would be willing to recommend Mr.. Graff <br /> 6 be granted a 20 foot variance for the canopy. and a 10 foot variance for the <br /> 7 pumps. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 The Commissioner said he perceived if Mr. Graff did as he had suggested, there <br /> 10 would be about 22 feet left between the station and the pump island and he sug- <br /> 1 1 gested it might be necessary to allow only one way traffic between the two. <br /> 12 He perceived the ordinance had been written to keep greater distance between gas <br /> 13 station pumps and the traffic and Commissioner Jones said that. was why the City <br /> 14 had not allowed Amoco to put their pumps any closer to Silver Lake Road. He <br /> 15 agreed with the applicant that there hadn't been any major accidents on that <br /> 16 corner to date but if there had been, the Commissioner said, "You would have found <br /> 17 us a lot tougher than we are now" about any variances. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Commissioner Bowerman told Mr. Graff he perceived that when a person has a piece <br /> 20 of property where the existing .structure predates an ordinance, he is allowed to <br /> 21 continue that non-conforming -,use as long as it is continued in the same fashion. <br /> 22 However, if that person elects to make substantial changes to the property, the <br /> 23 question which has to be answered is whether the change is still protected by <br /> 24 the "grandfather" clause. The Commissioner indicated there had been instances <br /> 25 in the Village several years ago where two businesses which' had -been protected by <br /> 26 the same clause had been destroyed by. a tornado and the non-conforming -;use had <br /> • <br /> 27 not been permitted to be rebuilt. Commissioner Bowerman indicated he. perceived <br /> 28 the Commission would now be requesting staff to give a legal opinion on whether <br /> 29 the station's changes would -fall within the same category. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 No one else appeared to provide input to the discussion and the hearing was <br /> 32 closed at 8:07 P.M. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Motion by Commissioner Bowerman and seconded .by Commissioner Madden to table the <br /> 35 request for a change at the Murphy Service Station, 3501 - 29th Avenue N.E. , <br /> 36 pending staff opinion as to the next action required of the Commission. <br /> i 37 <br /> 38 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 At 8:08 P.M. , the hearing was opened to consider a .request from Tom Peters of the <br /> ! <br /> 41 Nationwide Sewing Machine store in the St. Anthony Shopping Center 'for. .a variance <br /> 42 from the Sign Ordinance allowance of only one sign per store which would allow <br /> 43 the proprietor of the. store to replace the existing, non-conforming, "grandfathered <br /> 44 in", 16 foot X '18 foot reader board on the southwest side of his corner store <br /> 45 witha 14 foot X 3foot 3 inch sign advertising that an "Oreck Vacuum 'Cleaner <br /> 46 Care Center" would now be operating from his store. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 The notice of the hearing which the Chair read aloud had been published in the <br /> 49 June 4th Bulletin and sent to all property owners of record within 200. feet of <br /> 50- the subject property. No one present reported failure to receive the notice or <br /> 51 objected to its content and the Manager reported receiving no calls related to <br /> j 52 the variance request. <br /> • 53 <br /> 54 In his June 13th memorandum, Mr. Childs had indicated- the total signage the <br /> 55 store would have if the variance for. the proposed sign were granted would be <br />