Laserfiche WebLink
-10- <br /> said. he .was very much in favor of the changes, per- <br /> 1 ceiving this would. restate the existing Ordinance for <br /> 2 better enforcement; <br /> 3 <br /> 4 -agreed that having the beer truck parked around the <br /> 5 Village for years was one of the matters which the <br /> 6 new Ordinance would address; <br /> 7 <br /> 8 -disputed that the Ordinance took away anyone' s rights <br /> 9 to house a family in a home built large enough to ac- <br /> 10 commodate them; <br /> 11 <br /> 12 -said he had seen huge delivery trucks parked every <br /> 13 day in front of residences or in their driveways and <br /> 14 hoped the Ordinance would be enforced to keep com- <br /> 15 mer-cial vehicles- in commercial areas; <br /> 16 <br /> 17 -was glad to see the Ordinance requiring vehicles to , <br /> 18 be parked on paved areas, but wanted to see something <br /> 19 written in to guarantee no more than perhaps a <br /> 20 quarter of the front yards would be paved over but <br /> 21 at least so that paving doesn' t absorb the whole <br /> 22 front yard. Wouldn' t want to see a "concrete jungle <br /> 23 out there. " ; <br /> 24 <br /> 5 -thinks the City is flirting with just that with this <br /> 25 <br /> Ordinance if some landscaping is not required as <br /> 27 well; <br /> 28 -wanted setbacks from the property lines and struc- <br /> 29 <br /> 30 tures better defined to correct the impression that <br /> 31 the property owner can control access to the City' s <br /> 32 boulevard next to the road; <br /> 33 <br /> 34 -suggested paved areas not be allowed within a stated <br /> distance from the property lines to avoid problems <br /> 3 <br /> 355 with snow storage, etc. and to assure people like <br /> 37 joggers to use the boulevards; <br /> 38 <br /> 39 -the setback ) -:from the structure would assure that no <br /> 40 damage occurred to the residence from fire or an <br /> 41 explosion in a car parked in a paved area too close <br /> 42 to the structure; <br /> 43 <br /> 44 -Commissioner Hansen later questioned this suggestion, <br /> 45 saying there _are no restrictions against parking <br /> 46 cars next to structures in attached garages or on <br /> 47 driveways close to the homes; <br /> 48 <br /> 49 -suggested the City should research other cities to <br /> 50 protect St.' Anthony from challenges to the new ordin- <br /> 51 ances. He .didn' t believe the City should become the <br /> 52 pacesetters with these ordinances but rather could <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />