Laserfiche WebLink
-7- <br /> • 1 <br /> 2 -perceived this was a unique situation and considered <br /> 3 Mrs. Ittner ' s request to be able to sell her house to <br /> 4 be a reasonable one; <br /> 5 <br /> 6 -wanted the record to show that the Commissione5 were <br /> 7 neither for or against either of the neighbors, and <br /> 8 that the decision to table the matter had been with <br /> 9 the blessings of both parties. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 London -considered the distance between houses to be somewhat <br /> 12 "cosmetic" but wanted assurance the drainage wouldn' t <br /> 13 adversely affect the house next door; <br /> 14 <br /> 15 -thought Mr. Nelson' s was a good proposal and wanted to <br /> 16 see the neighbors agree on a time limit over which <br /> 17 Mr. Nelson would have to wait to build his garage. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Wingard -indicated the most important issue as far as he was <br /> 20 concerned was the stress Mrs. Ittner was already ex- <br /> 21 periencing with the death of her husband and trying to <br /> 22 sell her property; <br /> 23 <br /> 24 -said he would appreciate Mr. Nelson giving her a <br /> 25 couple of months to get the property sold; <br /> 26 <br /> • 27 -told Mr. Nelson he perceived he had a better chance <br /> 28 of getting the garage he wanted approved if he waited <br /> 29 for the Commission' s decision. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 The hearing was closed at 8: 23 P.M. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commission Action <br /> 34 <br />' 35 Motion by Hansen, seconded by Werenicz to table the request from <br /> 36 Dwayne Nelson for a four foot variance to the Ordinance requirement <br /> 37 for 15 foot total side yard setbacks until the April Commission <br /> 38 meeting. The request is tabled to provide Mr. Nelson and Mrs. <br /> 39 Ittner and her representative the opportunity to resolve either an <br /> 40 alternative to the plan or a date when the proposed garage <br /> 41 construction might take place. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Year XIII <br /> 46 Allocation <br /> 47 <br /> 48 The public hearing to receive public input on how the City' s . <br /> 49 allocation of CDBG funds should be divided was opened at 8: 35 P.M. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 The notice of hearing which indicated the activities which the City <br /> • 52 was proposing to fund with these monies had been published in the <br /> 53 . March 4, 1987 Bulletin, however no resident was present to aid the <br /> 54 Commission in formulating a recommendation to the Council. <br /> 55 <br />