My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 04211987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1987
>
PL MINUTES 04211987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:51:02 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1987
SP Name
PL MINUTES 04211987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-8- <br /> • 1 -wanted to know why Mr. Schroeder had not been required to grade <br /> 2 the lot he was going to buy next to him when he had been <br /> 3 granted a. variance for his construction; <br /> 4 <br /> 5 -was told that was because that involved only one property and <br /> 6 this issue involved a subdivision for which the City likes <br /> 7 to have all grading agreed to before platting. Mr. Childs <br /> 8 said Mr. Schroeder would have been required to do some grading <br /> 9 to develop his property as he had proposed. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Dr. Robert Osterbauer, 3504 Belden Drive and son, Joseph <br /> 12 <br /> 13 -were told the existing City Ordinances don' t require homes to <br /> 14 be at street level or address elevations of driveways but the <br /> 15' City does require that properties be developed in such a man- <br /> 16 ner as not to negatively impact on the neighbors; <br /> 17 <br /> 18 -Dr. Osterbauer said he would prefer not to see the property <br /> 19 developed at all because the path which has been worn through <br /> 20 the property over the years channels the runoff onto the street <br /> 21 and not onto his property; <br /> 22 <br /> 23 -the Chair Pro Tem told them the engineers Mr. Evanson retained <br /> 24 would be advising him about what drainage would be required and <br /> 25 the developer would be unable to provide that information that <br /> 2.6 evening. <br /> • 27 <br /> 28 Mr. Forsberg: <br /> 29 <br /> 30 -reiterated that he hoped the Evanson property could be <br /> 31 developed as long as the developer is required to grade his <br /> 32 property to match what was required of him when he built his <br /> 33 home; <br /> 34 <br /> 35 -he said the lawsuit had resulted when he had asked to have the <br /> 36 Evanson property sloped down to protect his property. He had <br /> 37 put in a retaining wall when that had not been accomplished in <br /> 38 spite of both parties incurring substantial court costs. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Two prospective buyers of lots from Mr. Evanson expressed their <br /> 41 concerns about the resultant lots after the City' s requirements are <br /> 42 met. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Chris Paidosh, 3155 Old Highway 8 <br /> 45 <br /> 46 =estimated the lot he was interested in buying was 16 feet off <br /> 47 street level and about even with the top of Dr. Osterbauer' s <br /> 48 garage; <br /> 49 <br /> 50 -said a builder had told him the excavated dirt would have to be <br /> 51 taken from the site before a house could be built there; <br /> • 52 <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.