My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 09151987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1987
>
PL MINUTES 09151987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:50:26 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:50:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1987
SP Name
PL MINUTES 09151987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 than the one caretaker residence already allowed in this particular <br /> 2 mini-warehouse, which is the only facility of this type in St. <br /> 3 Anthony. He indicated it was therefore hard for him to conceive <br /> 4 how this would open the City to a deluge of similar requests for <br /> 5 other types of buildings. Commissioner Werenicz responded that he <br /> 6 agreed with the Chair that the precedent would be established for <br /> 7 other types of businesses to ask for similar treatment which would <br /> 8 favor their own business. <br /> 9 Commissioner Madden pointed out that this particular Ordinance had <br /> 10 apparently been on the books for at least nine years. Mr. Childs <br /> 11 had confirmed that, in the six years he had been with the City, no <br /> 12 business had come in to him to ask for a caretaker residence in <br /> 13 their own building because the precedent for doing that had been <br /> 14 established with the mini-warehouse facility. <br /> 15 The Manager reported he was aware of instances where the code had <br /> 16 been enforced and the property owners had not asked to have the <br /> 17 Ordinance changed. One of these had been when the proprietor of <br /> 18 Craig & Company had rented space in his basement but made the <br /> 19 family leave after the City had told him the Ordinance. didn' t <br /> 20 permit that. Mr. Childs said staff had also been keeping a close <br /> 21 eye on the Northgate Office Park to see unit owners didn' t try to <br /> 22 use the space above their offices, which have water and plumbing <br /> 23 fixtures. None of these owners had yet asked for an Ordinance <br /> •24 change, he added. <br /> 25 Commissioner Werenicz quoted the suggestion Mr. Childs had made in <br /> 26 his memorandum that "the major question the Commissioner had to <br /> 27 address with the mini-warehouse request was whether a facility this <br /> 28 small really needs two on-site resident caretakers" and reiterated <br /> 29 that it was his own position that the applicant had failed to <br /> 30 demonstrate there was "a real need" for the second residence in <br /> 31 this building. <br /> 32 Mr. Solie conceded that the caretaker would not normally let <br /> 33 tenants into their units after hours, but persisted in. saying this <br /> 34 is a 7 day, 16 hour operation, which demanded the presence of <br /> 35 someone on the site at all times. He told Commissioner London <br /> 36 there is plenty of work to keep that person occupied because with <br /> 37 about a 5% turnover every week, the caretaker keeps busy showing <br /> 38 the units to new tenants, signing leases and performing other <br /> 39 general duties like maintaining the units and collecting the rents <br /> 40 and locking and unlocking the units each day. The Chair told him <br /> 41 she found those duties to be analogous to the responsibilities of <br /> 42 an apartment caretaker. <br /> 43 Mr. Childs drew the Commission' s attention to the fact that, <br /> 44 although the caretaker unit in the mini-warehouse was a condition- <br /> 45 ally permitted use in the current Ordinance, in the event the <br /> 46 facility was burned down or otherwise destroyed, the owners would <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.