My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 12151992
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1992
>
PL MINUTES 12151992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:19:53 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1992
SP Name
PL MINUTES 12151992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Planning Commission Meeting <br /> 2 December 15, 1992 <br /> • 3 Page Tinee <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 B. Concept Review for Lot Split to Build Single Family Home at 2612-14 37th Avenue <br /> 8 N.E. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Mr. Urbia explained that this proposal was being presented for a concept review under the <br /> 11 new policy of giving variance requests concept reviews rather than having proposals which <br /> 12 have the potential of not being approved presented as formal applications for which <br /> 13 application fees would have to be paid. <br /> l.4 <br />_ - 15 The Management Assistant pointed out that the proposal from Douglas and Nancy Tanner, <br /> 16 2206 St. Anthony Boulevard, would require three variances as well as a zoning change. He <br /> 17 said the existing lot is zoned R-2 and a change to R-1 would be necessary for the proposed <br /> 18 single family dwelling. The City Zoning Ordinance requires an interior lot to have at least <br /> 19 9,000 square feet with a width of 75 feet where the single family lot the Tanners propose <br /> 20 would have only 6,500 square feet and would be only 65 feet wide. This would leave only an <br /> 21 area of 8,500 square feet around the duplex where the Ordinance requires 14,000 square.feet <br /> 22 for a duplex on a corner lot. The width requirement of 100 feet however would be met. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Mr. Urbia suggested the Commissioners determine whether the hardship required by state <br /> 25 statute could be established for the variances necessary for this lot split and also whether the <br /> 26 precedent which would be set would be appropriate. <br /> 27 <br /> • 28 Commissioner Murphy inquired whether staff had been able to do the requested research on <br /> 29 the nunnber of St. Anthony lots where there is a potential for creating 65 foot lots. Mr. Urbia <br /> 30 indicated he had not been able to complete that analysis but said lie perceived the proposed lot <br /> 31 split was not the same since the lots lie was to report on for the most part involved-separate <br /> 32 parcels which would be combined for tax purposes or small lots which might be combined to <br /> 33 allow for larger homes. The Commissioner lie was mostly interested in existing city lots <br /> 34 which are 65 feet wide to compare with the Tamer proposal. He indicated he would also be <br /> 35 concerned with creating an 8,500 square foot corner lot for a duplex. The Chair agreed, <br /> 36 pointing out that the existing lot was only 1,000 square feet larger than the 14,000 square feet <br /> 37 required for this comer lot. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Mr. Tanner discussed the drawing he had submitted for his proposal. He indicated he <br /> 40 believed the single family home he was requesting he be allowed to build next to the duplex <br /> 41 would cosmetically fit in well with the rest of that particular neighborhood. The applicant <br /> 42 said he had understood from Larry Hamer that although the total area in his proposal might be <br /> 43 less than required by City code, the offsets would be in line with the ordinance requirements. <br /> 44 Mr. Tanner told the Commissioners he believed there would be at least 20 feet between the <br /> 45 proposed single family structure and the house next door. There would also be at least 30 feet <br /> 46 between his daughter's home and the duplex and the required 30 foot front yard setbacks <br /> 47 would be maintained for both buildings along Harding Street. <br /> 48 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.