Laserfiche WebLink
01 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> 2 MARCH 16 , 1993 <br /> 3 PAGE 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Currently, a cement slab or treated wood base is required so <br /> 7 that the bottom of a utility building does not decay. <br /> 8 <br /> .9 Dimensional regulations are covered in the zoning ordinance. <br /> 10 Maintenance of these structures is covered in the recently <br /> 11 adopted Housing Maintenance Ordinance. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Another example of this type of structure could be a large <br /> 14 garage which was a possibility noted by Chair Faust . <br /> 15 Commissioner Madden cited a second garage located on property <br /> 16 on Chandler Drive. He recalled that the Planning Commission <br /> 17 had recommended denial of the permit for this garage but the <br /> 18 City Council gave its approval . <br /> 19 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 7 . STAFF UPDATE <br /> 22 <br /> 23 A. Sian Amortization <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Some members of the City Council did not feel the matter of <br /> sign amortization was necessary for inclusion on the sign <br /> ordinance nor were further restrictions regarding business <br /> 28 signs . <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Urbia advised that the owners of Northgate were sent a letter <br /> 31 advising them of their sign non-compliance. They will be <br /> 32 requesting a variance in late April . This will be treated as <br /> 33 a variance request as the building is not facing two streets . <br /> 34 The first sign request was approved as a variance . <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Urbia advised that the owners were very cooperative. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 B. Directional/Informational Sians <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Commissioner Franzese directed the Commission members ' <br /> 41 attention to page 7 of the February 23rd Council meeting <br /> 42 minutes . They read as follows , " The City Manager advised that <br /> 43 these types of signs , directional and informational , are not <br /> 44 defined in the sign ordinance nor are these types of signs <br /> 45 controlled. " She questioned what was considered directional <br /> 46 and informational . <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Urbia advised that approximately 30 letters went to properties <br /> 49 in the City advising them of their non-conforming signs . Among <br /> 50 the signs which were viewed as non-compliant was the DARE <br /> • <br />