My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 06151993
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1993
>
PL MINUTES 06151993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:15:44 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1993
SP Name
PL MINUTES 06151993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Planning Commission Meeting <br /> June 15, 1993 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Minneapolis School of Massage. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Faust asked if massage personnel are licensed. Urbia said they are most likely state <br /> 4 licensed as the City does not license massage personnel. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Franzese asked about advertising and signage. Anderson said her ads would mention this <br /> 7 additional service. She receives no signage in the mall. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Werenicz wondered about the timeline Anderson wanted to offer this service. Anderson <br /> 10 stated she wants to be open by August. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Werenicz felt two of the three recommended conditions could not be met, only number <br /> 13 two regarding criminal sexual conduct. Urbia said medical care could be changed to <br /> 14 therapeutic massage. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Anderson felt that by granting the conditional use it would be an asset to, her business. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 With no further discussion, Faust closed the public hearing at 7:33 P.M.. <br /> 9 <br /> 0 Motion by Franzese, second by Werenicz to recommend approval with the three <br /> 21 recommended conditions, but amending the first condition by deleting medical care and <br /> 22 adding a fourth condition, where the massage personnel must be licensed by the State of <br /> 23 Minnesota. In recommending approval of the request, the Commission finds that no one <br /> 24 spoke in opposition; that precedence had been set; and the request does comply with <br /> 25 requirements of the conditional use. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Gondorchin was uneasy about the service provider not being present and he was not sure <br /> 28 of the third and fourth conditions. However, other Commissioners felt that if the <br /> 29 conditions could not be met, the applicant will have to come back through the conditional <br /> 30 use process. Staff will look into the issues in condition three and four and present this <br /> 31 to the Council. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Voting on the motion: <br /> 34 Aye: Thompson, Franzese, Faust, Werenicz, and Madden. <br /> 35 Nay: Gondorchin. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Motion Carried <br /> 38 <br /> 39 C. Application for Conditional Use Permit, James R. Bona, St. Anthony Unocal, <br /> 40 Inc.. 2812 27th Avenue Northeast <br /> 04 1 <br /> 2 The hearing was opened at 7:37 P.M. by Chair Faust who read,the Notice of Hearing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.