PL MINUTES 04191994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

01 Planning Commission Minutes 2 April 19, 1994 3 Page 5 4 5 Makowske amended his motion. 6 7 Motion by Makowske, second by Berg to recommend Council approval of the variance 8 request from Darrin and JoAnn Mercil, for 3112 Silver Lake Road, as follows: (1) the lot 9 limits the position of the home; (2)the City requires that the garage face Townview Avenue; 10 (3) the lot is platted and buildable, but the previous home was small and not of today's 11 standards; (4)because of the additional 6 feet right-of-way along street there is an additional 12 circumstance that is found in almost no other place in this City; and (5) that the survey be 13 rechecked to satisfy the neighbors. 14 15 Motion carried unanimously. 16 17 18 Conditional use permit and setback variance request by Merlin Olson. for 2700 - 37th 19 Avenue N.E. 20 21 Notice of the public hearing had been published in the St.Anthony Bulletin on April 6, 1994 and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. 3 24 Staff Report 25 26 Interim City Manager Hamer reported that C.M. Corp was requesting a variance of 9 feet to 27 the front on 37th Avenue N.E.and 5 feet to the side facing Stinson Boulevard and a building . 28 variance of 11 feet. They are planning to tear down the existing gas station and put up a 29 convenience store with gas pumps and a canopy. This would bring the building 30 approximately 9 feet 6 inches to the property line,the setback to residential is 20 feet. The 31 canopy is off by the street setback of 35 feet. 32 33 Chair Gondorchin asked if a comprehensive sign plan had been submitted. Mr. Hamer stated 34 it had not been submitted. Bill Martin, representing Mr. Olson, stated that the sign on the 35 elevation drawing was not the one which would be used, but that one on a pole would be 36 used, not a monument type. 37 38 Chair Gondorchin asked what site differences exist between the blueprints that Mr. Martin 39 had with him and the drawing submitted to the Commissioner members. Mr. Hamer stated 40 that all gas stations are conditional uses, and since the present structure will be torn down —41 --- _ .and new construction done on-the property, any conditions the Commissioners desire can be 42 placed on the project. Mr. Martin stated that to the best of his knowledge there were no - — differences between his blueprints and the elevation drawing. Chair Gondorchin again asked *4 about the planned sign. Mr. Martin stated that they are requesting a pedestal sign mounted 45 on a pole, but it would not be a high-rise sign. Mr. Martin requests a sign as pictured in