My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 05161995
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1995
>
PL MINUTES 05161995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:07:01 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:06:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1995
SP Name
PL MINUTES 05161995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
; r <br /> Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • May 16, 1995 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 In response to Commissioner Makowske's question, Mr. Gram indicated devaluation of property, <br /> 2 and increase in traffic would create impacts to the neighborhood that he felt were detrimental. <br /> 3 Chair Bergstrom inquired if there were any traffic studies regarding Fordham Drive. <br /> 4 Moore-Sykes indicated the study done in 1991 does not include Fordham Drive, because traffic <br /> 5 count reports Fordham was not busy enough to be included in the traffic study. Moore-Sykes <br /> 6 indicated the statistics she had were for Silver Lake and Silver Lane. <br /> 7 Ms. Diane Schroeder, 3929 Fordham Drive, indicated this project started because of the desire of <br /> 8 accessible homes. She noted that while she and-her husband, Tom, would benefit as a result of <br /> 9 the replatting of the property, she too was concerned about additional traffic, but perhaps a stop <br /> 10 sign would be a benefit. She indicated her wheelchair is her only means of mobility, and she <br /> 11 would like to see a stop sign to slow traffic on Fordham Drive. <br /> 12 Mr. Roger Zambinski, 4013 Fordham Drive, inquired as to why the property could not be <br /> 13 accessed from Silver Lane. <br /> Moore-Sykes indicated that the property is a self contained area and the option of access through <br /> Silver Lane, would be through the Evergreen property. She indicated the road through Evergreen <br /> 16 is a private road and the residents of Evergreen have indicated they did not want traffic through <br /> 17 their property. <br /> 18 Moore-Sykes indicated that as suggested by the State traffic study, there may not be as <br /> 19 substantial an increase in traffic to Fordham Drive. This will depend upon the residents of the <br /> 20 Townhomes. <br /> 21 Mr. Newman indicted Nedegaard Construction, Inc. has sold all rights to Evergreen,that <br /> 22 property was not designed for an expansion. He noted the applicant is willing to work with <br /> 23 Evergreen if they would allow a drive through, but that does not seem to be the desire of the <br /> 24 residents. <br /> 25 Ms. Linda Jessen, 3476 Silver Lane,president of Evergreen Townhomes Homeowners' <br /> 26 Association, indicated the road under discussion is a private road and the residents do not want <br /> 27 through traffic. <br /> 28 Ms. Norma Gordon, 4012 Fordham Drive, asked if the Commission had seen the property. She <br /> 29 felt there was not enough room for the project and suggested fewer buildings. <br /> 30 Ms. Gordon suggested Single Family homes be proposed. <br /> 4p1 Chair Bergstrom indicated he had walked the site. He noted the lot sizes are in accordance with <br /> 32 City code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.