PL MINUTES 01161996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes • January 16, 1996 Page 9 1 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if Mr. Finn's concerns from the last meeting can be 2 addressed. 3 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Finn's charge of demolition of more than 25 percent is not 4 true according to the environment attorneys from First Bank and Opus. 5 Commissioner Makowske questioned if Mr. Finn forwarded the information he indicated to Chair 6 Bergstrom. Chair Bergstrom indicated he did not receive anything from Mr. Finn. 7 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the attorneys are trying to anticipate those questions that may 8 come from Mr. Finn and others. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated there are few homeowners around 9 the lake area that are not supporting the Apache Plaza redevelopment due to devaluations and 10 taxes. 11 Commissioner Franzese clarified for Commissioner Delmonico the issue of the ecology of the lake 12 and the phosphorus content with respect to the Apache Plaza redevelopment. 13 Ms. Moore-Sykes reviewed with the Commission the site map presented to Staff earlier, indicating 14 Outlots A, B, and C, storm water retention ponds included in the development, and Lot 1-6, with Lot 7 remaining after demolition. She continued that Rice Creek Watershed (RCWS) has these q06 plans. 17 Chair Bergstrom indicated he spoke with the RCWS manager who indicated that at this point they 18 have no preliminary concerns with the plan, as it appears to be in conformance with RCWS 19 standards. He continued that RCWS cannot make any recommendations without the EAW's 20 approval, but at this point, it appears to be acceptable. 21 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the January 30th Special Planning Commission will address the zero 22 lot line issue, as well as this plan. 23 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the conceptual idea for Lot 7 on the site plan is only for the 24 purpose of the January 30th meeting, and may change. 25 Chair Bergstrom questioned if the submission for the fourth water pond is shown on the plan. 26 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated it was to appear on the plan, and may be the EAW report. She 27 continued that grading and elevations such as Phase I will run to retention ponds, and there is no 28 need to change Lot 7, as it is not developed. 29 Commissioner Gondorchin inquired if the ponding will be in front of New Market. Ms. Moore- 30 Sykes indicated that it will. 10 Commissioner Thompson inquired if the name will be changed to "Silver Lake Center" as 32 indicated on the plan. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that it was being considered, but would likely