Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> February 17, 1998 <br /> • <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1 VIII. OTHER BUSINESS. <br /> 2 2. March 4, 1998, 5:45 P.M. Joint Planning Commission/City Council Meeting (Council <br /> 3 Worksession at 7:00 P.M.). <br /> 4 Chair Bergstrom distributed a draft list of discussion items for the Joint Planning <br /> 5 Commission/City Council meeting. He asked Commissioners for comments, deletions or <br /> 6 additions. <br /> 7 Commissioner Makowske noted question#3., Past Actions, which deals with "variance <br /> 8 applicants" and suggested that "conditional use permit applicants" should be added to that <br /> 9 question. <br /> 10 Commissioner Makowske suggested that "split liquor" should be added to question#1, Future <br /> 11 Actions. <br /> 12 Chair Bergstrom noted that in question#2, Future Actions,the word "geographical" should be <br /> 13 added before the word "area". <br /> 14 Chair Bergstrom noted question#3, Future Actions, which deals with enforcing housing codes. <br /> 15 He explained that the Fire Department is currently enforcing housing codes and that the Fire <br /> 0 Chief and City Manager have stated that this is going well. <br /> 17 Ms. Moore-Sykes explained it was thought that the uniformed presence may carry some weight <br /> 18 in enforcement. Also, the Fire Department is not seen so much as the enforcer, so they are seen <br /> 19 as benign and respected at the same time. <br /> 20 Chair Bergstrom noted in questions ##4 and#5, Future Actions,which deal with the role of the <br /> 21 Planning Commission in future stormwater actions and in parks redevelopment, that possibly the <br /> 22 Commission should have a different role than having a representative on the task force. <br /> 23 Chair Bergstrom noted question#6, Future Actions, which deals with how the Planning <br /> 24 Commission proceeds in implementing the goals of the new Comprehensive Plan. He stated <br /> 25 there are a lot of issues which deal with infrastructure, that if are done, could be done in <br /> 26 conjunction with public works projects up the street. He stated it is important for the Planning <br /> 27 Commission and the Public Works Department to be familiar with this aspect of the <br /> 28 Comprehensive Plan so that as design engineering and maintenance is performed, it is known <br /> 29 that this is in the Plan and also the process for implementation. <br /> 30 Chair Bergstrom noted in question#7, which deals with methods of ongoing communication.of <br /> 31 ideas and feedback between the Council and Planning Commission, that there may be other <br /> 32 vehicles of communication worth pursuing beyond a joint meeting once per year. <br /> 0 There was Commission consensus for Staff to draft a copy of the Discussion Items with the <br /> 34 suggested changes for inclusion in the packet for the March 4, 1998 Joint Meeting. <br />