PL MINUTES 02171998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes • February 17, 1998 Page 7 1 Chair Bergstrom suggested the motion include "transmission broadcast or reception". 2 Commissioner Makowske suggested the motion include that "the conditional permit meets all 3 three criteria of the granting of a conditional use permit as follows: 4 1. This use is an allowed conditional use for this zoning district under City Code Section 5 1160.06, Subd. 2. 6 2. The proposed antenna will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of 7 persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values or 8 improvements to the vicinity. 9 3. The proposed antenna is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a service 10 or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the 11 general welfare of the neighborhood or community and provide more service to St. 12 Anthony and surrounding communities." 13 Chair Bergstrom suggested that the motion include the condition that "the antenna cannot 14 interfere with broadcast or reception of telephone, radio, television, or any other electronic 15 communication". Commissioner Horst accepted the amendments to the motion. Commissioner Kaczor seconded the amended motion. 18 19 Motion carried unanimously. 20 21 Chair Bergstrom noted this request will be considered by the City Council at their February 24, 22 1998 meeting. 23 VII. NEW BUSINESS -None. 24 25 VIII. OTHER BUSINESS - Continued. 26 1. Comprehensive Plan Update Process. 27 Bill Weber, BRW, Inc., reported the Comprehensive Plan had been submitted to the 28 Metropolitan Council to begin their ninety day review. Several months ago the City Council and 29 Planning Commission had endorsed the Plan and since that time there have been a couple of 30 technical additions and one minor change. 31 There had been discussion that the Metropolitan Council forecast for household,population and 32 employment for the year 2020 was too high. The options available were to accept the forecast as 33 provided or for the City to determine their own forecast. It has been determined that the City 34 will accept the Metropolitan Council forecast. It has been noted, however, on pages 1-5 and 1-9 that "The City accepts these forecasts, and is willing to accommodate the projected amount of development. However, we recognize that, given the limited amount of land available for new 37 development and the difficulty in predicting the timing of redevelopment, the projected amount