PL MINUTES 06161998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes • June 16, 1998 Page 6 1 Commissioner Gondorchin noted that the creation of hazardous waste would violate the 2 conditional use which is being approved. 3 Mr. Warner noted the lease with Mr. Alvite will not commensurate until February 1, 1999 to 4 allow improvements to be made to the building, including a new roof and facade. He asked if the 5 Conditional Use Permit could become effective on February 1, 1999 or the date that Mr. Alvite 6 opens for business, whichever comes first. 7 Chair Bergstrom questioned the consequence of delays in construction. 8 Mr. Warner stated he was confident that there will be no delays. The papers are signed. 9 Chair Bergstrom amended Condition#4 of the motion to state, "The Conditional Use Permit will 10 expire five years from February 1, 1999 or five years from the date that Mr. Alvite opens for 11 business, whichever comes first." Commissioner Thompson agreed to the amendment. 12 Voting on the motion: Bergstrom, Gondorchin, Kaczor, Makowske, Thompson voted aye. Horst 13 abstained. 0 The motion carried. 15 VII. OTHER BUSINESS. 16 A. Concept Review. 17 1. Proposed Residential Garage Expansion. 18 Ms. Moore-Sykes reported this resident had been advised of the concept review process and 19 asked to provide copies of a drawing of the proposed project. The resident has not submitted 20 anything for review by the Planning Commission. 21 This item was kept on the agenda because the resident was informed when the Planning 22 Commission meeting was to be held. No one appeared at the meeting to address this request. 23 2. Proposed Residential Garage Reconstruction. 24 Ms. Moore-Sykes reported that Robert Jensen, 2908 Roosevelt Street NE, is proposing to 25 remodel his home, remove an existing breezeway, and construct a new double-car garage. The 26 garage will be setback on the property and the driveway will be extended to that point. This will 27 require a lot coverage variance of 82 square feet for the driveway and the garage. The proposal 28 will also require a garage setback permit. 29 Chair Bergstrom questioned the side setback requirements for a garage setback permit. He also 30 asked if a variance would be required for the principal structure. •1 Ms. Moore-Sykes noted that the principal structure will not require a variance. The garage 32 setback permit allows a sideyard setback of three feet and the proposed structure will have a five