Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> June 20, 2000 <br /> Page 3 <br /> • <br /> 1 Motion by Stille, second by Thomas, to approve a 15-foot lot variance and a 1,015 lot coverage <br /> 2 variance due to the following reasons: (1) the property cannot be put to reasonable use with the <br /> 3 current zoning; (2) the lot is unique in nature (3) the landowner did not cause the uniqueness; and <br /> 4 (4) the variance will be in the spirit of the Zoning Code and will not alter the surrounding <br /> 5 environment. <br /> 6 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 7 Bergstrom reminded the Sperrys that this issue would before the City Council on June 27, 2000. <br /> 8 He would encourage Mr. and Mrs. Sperry to attend the meeting to answer questions. <br /> 9 2. Public Hearing: AT&T Wireless for 2801 37th Avenue NE. <br /> 10 Chair Bergstrom opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m. <br /> 11 Chair Bergstrom requested a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom stated that AT&T <br /> 12 Wireless Services was applying for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a new 75-foot cellular <br /> 13 monopole to be placed on an industrial zoned property at 2801 37th Avenue NE. AT&T has <br /> 14 obtained permission from the owner of the property, who was present at the meeting. This would <br /> 15 be the second such monopole on this property, with the first being owned by US West Wireless <br /> �16 Services. <br /> �I7 Bergstrom invited Julie Townsend, AT&T Wireless, to address the Commission. Ms. Townsend <br /> 18 stated that she was present to request a conditional use permit on behalf of AT&T Wireless <br /> 19 Services, to allow for a 75 foot monopole at the property located at 2801 37th Avenue NE. She <br /> 20 stated she had brought pictures as requested at the Concept Review in May, and in that respect, <br /> 21 she showed the photographs for the Commissioners to review. <br /> 22 Ms. Townsend stated that the proposed equipment building is expected to be 12" x 28" and <br /> 23 would be made of a material that will match the building and can be painted the same color. The <br /> 24 monopole would be standing next to the equipment shelter. The shelter and monopole can be <br /> 25 situated to meet any setback requirements to the real property line. The assumed property line is <br /> 26 along a fence, so a variance was not needed. <br /> 27 Thomas inquired if there had been any further discussion about building a tower that was 100 <br /> 28 foot tall, or the possibility of building a pole of 75 feet, with the capacity to add on an additional <br /> 29 25 feet. This would be in the case that any other wireless services wished to place a monopole in <br /> 30 the area. <br /> 31 Melsha inquired if any further discussions had been achieved with US West about co-locating the <br /> 32 monopole. Ms. Townsend said discussions did continue, but a standstill was reached. <br /> Chair Bergstrom called for any input from the audience, and hearing none, closed the Public <br /> Hearing at 7:30 p.m. <br />