Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 18, 2000 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 1 Tillmann that sidewalks need to be implemented. Bergstrom responded that sidewalks have <br /> 2 typically been installed during major street reconstruction. Stille noted for the audience's <br /> 3 benefit;that the City has applied to the Metropolitan Council for a grant which would assist the <br /> 4 City in being more envisionary with regard to the site around Apache Plaza. <br /> 5 Hanson expressed concern about the hours of operation of the facility. <br /> 6 Motion by Bergstrom, second by Tillmann, that the Planning Commission recommend approval <br /> 7 of the Conditional Use Permit for Hadi and Roger Abou-Mourad for the property located at 3813 <br /> 8 Stinson Boulevard NE for the following reasons and with the following conditions: <br /> 9 Reasons <br /> 10 1. The proposed use is listed as one of the conditional uses specifically listed for the zoning <br /> 11 district in which it is to be located; <br /> 12 2. The proposed conditional use mill not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general <br /> 13 welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property values or <br /> 14 improvements in the vicinity; <br /> 15 3. The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location to provide a <br /> 10 service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to <br /> the general welfare of the neighborhood or community. <br /> 18 Conditions <br /> 19 1. The hours of operation may be from 7:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m.; but subject to change if <br /> 20 noise issues arise from either residents or other occupants in the area; <br /> 21 2. The applicant must consult with City Staff regarding compatible decorative lighting, <br /> 22 once that pattern is established, and then arrive at a proposal that would be approved by <br /> 23 the Public Works Director; <br /> 24 3. The applicant must consult with the Public Works Director to design appropriate <br /> 25 infiltration of the stormwater on the site; <br /> 26 4. That the applicant repair or refurbish the front of the existing building in concert with the <br /> 27 design presented at the July 18, 2000 Planning Commission meeting; <br /> 28 5. That the applicant replace the dumpster enclosure to the existing building as the current <br /> 29 structure is in disrepair; <br /> 30 6. That the design construction is compatible with the design drawings submitted with the <br /> 31 packet dated 6/29/00 as presented in the Commission's agenda package. <br /> '10 Voting on the Motion:Bergstrom, Tillmann, Hanson, Thomas, Melsha, and Stille voted aye. <br /> 33 Hatch voted nay. <br />