My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 08152000
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
2000
>
PL MINUTES 08152000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:44:40 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:44:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 2000
SP Name
PL MINUTES 08152000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> August 15, 2000 <br /> Page 9 <br /> • <br /> 1 Tillmann noted that someone had pointed out to her that the Lantern style is the chosen style of <br /> 2 many neighborhoods in Minneapolis. She had remembered that the Commission was hoping to <br /> 3 set St. Anthony apart.from other communities. <br /> 4 Bergstrom asked for a consensus from the Commission. Hatch confirmed that the decision <br /> 5 would set a standard for all of the streets. <br /> 6 Discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mr. Hubmer about the benefits of the <br /> 7 Vernon style of lighting as opposed to the.Lantem. <br /> 8 Jim Higgins, 2712 St. Anthony Boulevard, spoke to the Commission regarding the choice of <br /> 9 street lighting. He stated that he has heard in presentations that the Vernon is a more efficient <br /> 10 light, although more expensive. Additionally, he noted that he felt there were other issues in- <br /> 11 volved that individuals did not know at VillageFest, and he encouraged the Commission to con- <br /> 12 sider other options than those that received the most votes at VillageFest. He stated that Mr. <br /> 13 Hubmer had originally chosen the Vernon style due to the more efficient lighting. <br /> 14 Melsha added that he noted that some residents may have felt that they just had to pick a style, <br /> 15 and would not be opposed to a different style if chosen by the Commission. <br /> Stille noted that he did not have a problem with going forward with the Vernon style. <br /> 17 Bergstrom summarized that the Commission would recommend the Vernon style as a decorative <br /> 18 fixture and the shoebox fixture as the classic fixture, with black poles. <br /> 19 Bergstrom thanked Mr. Hubmer for his assistance and cooperation with the Planning Commis- <br /> 20 sion. <br /> 21 VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS. <br /> 22 1. New Draft Antennae Ordinance. <br /> 23 Chair Bergstrom asked for a report from Staff. Assistant City Manager Isom noted that he was <br /> 24 provided with a copy of Shoreview's antennae ordinance, and had acquired some ordinances <br /> 25 from other cities. He pulled out what he thought were the most significant of the ordinances, and <br /> 26 asked for direction from the Planning Commission with regard to developing a new antennae or- <br /> 27 dinance for the City. <br /> 28 Bergstrom reviewed with Isom the parts of each ordinance that he was in favor of and preferred <br /> 29 language for a new ordinance. Bergstrom would recommend that if Isom could pair the Dublin <br /> 30 ordinance down, or to modify the Shoreview ordinance to include the table on page 117 of the <br /> 31 Commission's agenda packets. <br /> Hatch mentioned that there were certain limitations to the FCC Act,but that there was something <br /> 3 in the ordinance that would steer the City towards the goals that it would like to achieve. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.