PL MINUTES 08152000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 15, 2000 Page 4 1 Stille inquired if there was a reason that the parcel that could be purchased from the railroad by 2 the Animal Clinic was not included. Isom responded that the Animal Clinic does not own the lot 3 at this point. Further, Isom noted that this parcel may be included in the final plat if a purchase 4 agreement goes forth. 5 Chair Bergstrom invited Mr. Ken Solie to approach the Commission. Mr. Solie conferred with 6 Mr. Hubmer regarding the plat and easements and then spoke to the Commission. 7 Mr. Solie noted that he was comfortable with the information already presented, and did not have 8 any additional information to report. 9 Isom requested that Mr. Hubmer provide Mr. Solie with the specifics on the easements 10 mentioned above that could be provided to the City. Mr. Solie's representative, Mr. Ogren, noted 11 that there did not appear to be any problems or concerns regarding the easements. 12 Chair Bergstrom called for additional input from the audience as per the Public Hearing. 13 David Ishner, 3644 Edward Street, stated that he had spoken with Mr. Isom prior to the meeting, 14 and stated that he was concerned that in the future there could be a reason to expand the building of the Apache Animal Hospital. His specific concern was the disposal of deceased animals. He felt it was appropriate to request that if expansion of the building happens in the future, that a 17 specific design should be implemented so as to shield the disposal of the deceased animals from 18 the public view. Currently, he stated,that he and his wife are exposed to the disposal of the car- 19 cass because the truck to pick up the:animals pulls up close to their home. He mentioned that for 20 residents that are sensitive to animals, it is a difficult scenario to witness. 21 Chair Bergstrom thanked Mr. Ishner for his input and attendance at the meeting. 22 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. and requested comments from the Com- 23 missioners. 24 Thomas confirmed that the discussion was to center around the replatting of this property. 25 Bergstrom noted that the issue seemed rather straightforward and he requested a motion. 26 Motion by Thomas, second by Bergstrom,to approve the proposed plat changes as dated May 27 31, 2000, and to incorporate the two—easement provisions as provided by Mr. Hubmer and as set 28 forth below: 29 --The plat should include a 20-foot utility easement along the east side of Lot 3 over the existing 30 watermain which runs north to south along the east side of Lot 3. --A ten-foot utility easement to be centered on the lot lines separating Lots 1 and 2, and the lot 2 line separating Lots 2 and 3. 33 Motion carried unanimously.