Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> September 19, 2000 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 Isom then reviewed for the Commission that at a prior Planning Commission meeting, he had re- <br /> 2 ceived direction that the Commission was in favor of adopting a similar ordinance as that of <br /> 3 Dublin's. In this respect, he would request that the Planning Commission adopt a subcommittee <br /> 4 or task force that would go forth with the facilitating of what would be ultimately presented to <br /> 5 the City Council. <br /> 6 Hanson asked what timeframe would be required. Isom noted that it would up to the Planning <br /> 7 Commission about the timeframe to get a proposed draft in workable form. <br /> 8 Hatch, Stille and Melsha volunteered to be on the task force for the antennae ordinance. <br /> 9 Motion by Hanson, second by Melsha, that the Planning Commission develop a subcommittee to <br /> 10 look at the antenna ordinance and the Commissioners that volunteered are Hatch, Stille and <br /> 11 Melsha. <br /> 12 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 13 2. Provide a Recommendation to Council of Whether to Pass an Interim Ordinance (Morato- <br /> 14 rium) Regarding Future Requests for Permits under Section 1160 (Antennas and Towers). <br /> AssistantCity Manager Isom reviewed for-the Commission the background relating to this issue . <br /> from prior meetings. <br /> 17 Discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners regarding the typical length of time for a morato- <br /> 18 rium. Assistant City Manager Isom noted that the typical moratorium is approximately one <br /> 19 year; however, the Planning Commission must.arrive at a timeframe that would allow sufficient <br /> 20 time to review, draft, and/or change ordinances. <br /> 21 Motion by Melsha, second by Hatch,that the Planning Commission recommends to the City <br /> 22 Council that a one-year moratorium be developed on antennas and towers in St. Anthony in order <br /> 23 to facilitate and research the drafting of possible ordinances. <br /> 24 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 25 3. Livable Cities Demonstration Account Proposal Letter, dated August 25, 2000. <br /> 26 Assistant City Attorney Isom noted that the grant was approved for the first round and a subse- <br /> 27 quent application has been received for Phase II. Additionally,the Mayor, Chair of the Planning <br /> 28 Commission, Staff and DSU (City's Consultants)have met to discuss the completion and <br /> 29 submittal of that application. Furthermore, it is'assumed and anticipated that the application will <br /> 30 be submitted on time and the process moved forward. <br /> 1 In response to a question by Tillmann about Apache Plaza,Isom noted that the Apache Plaza was <br /> originally included in the applicafion,but the application has been amended. <br />