Laserfiche WebLink
-8- <br /> which would justify granting either a conditional use permit or the <br /> requested variance for parking.. He perceives the only hardship the • <br /> restaurant proprietor would experience was not being, able to squeeze <br /> a larger cafe on.-an inadequately sized lot. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Jones <br /> to.. recommend. Council denial .of requests from Kin Lun Kwong for a <br /> conditional use permit, a -parking -space. variance and .rezoning of <br /> Lot 2, Block 6,_. -Murray Heights Addition (2700 Coolidge Street N.E. ) , <br /> which- would permit.. the. expansion of. the Good Luck. Cafe from a 765 - <br /> square foot structure to -2700 -square feet as proposed, finding that <br /> the. three conditions which must be satisfied for -the- conditional <br /> use .permit -and the. variance had not been met in the- proposal , and <br /> for . the .following additional reasons: <br /> (1) . The City Comprehensive Plan indicated. .there is a conflict of- <br /> land use in this particular area of the City and recommended <br /> that future land use should not be commercial. <br /> (2) Existing businesses in -the same neighborhood are overutilizing <br /> on-street parking now. <br /> (3) The Metropolitan Transit Commission also overutilizes all <br /> available street parking in the immediate vicinity of .the cafe . <br /> (4), Adequate snow storage was not addressed in the. proposal. <br /> (5) Adequate screening or adequacy of existing screening was not • <br /> addressed in the proposal . <br /> (6) There is a strong possibility that the property -values of homes <br /> to the southwest, northwest and north side of the subject <br /> property might be adversely affected by the proposal. <br /> (7.) There was a . strong indication that the .traffic in the adjoining <br /> alley would be dangerously increased. <br /> ,(8) Onsite loading, employee parking, and storage of- garbage had <br /> not ..been adequately addressedin the proposal. <br /> (9) The applicant had not provided adequate site plans .including <br /> landscaping plans.. <br /> (10) There was .a significant departure from the standards which have <br /> .. .been established in the community for commercial usage with <br /> the proposed pvosision of 22 parking spaces where 85 are required <br /> by City Ordinance. <br /> (11) Almost all available parking spaces provided on the site are <br /> required for.-the .existing building. <br /> (.12). ... ..Testimony .from ,the neighbors indicated-.a poor history .of building . <br /> ; .. .and land maintenance and weed .and odor .control with the existing • <br /> business. . <br />