Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> a3 <br /> -2- <br /> She read the motion recommending .Coun cil: approval of the variance to <br /> the City Sign Ordinance which would permit the - additional wall sign- . <br /> age requested for ;.the west side of .,the . Zantigo Restaurant- at 'Apache <br /> • Plaza Shopping .Center. - There was..no one present .to speak either -for <br /> or against the request and the Council indicated -its concurrence as <br /> follows : <br /> Motion by Councilman Letourneau .and seconded by Councilman .Marks. to <br /> grant a variance to the. City Sign Ordinance regulation (which permits <br /> only one sign on a. commercial building). for the wall. sign on the west <br /> side of the Zantigo Restaurant at- 3704 Silver Lake Road, as presented <br /> on Exhibit "Z" , finding, as did the Planning Commission, that: <br /> (1) -Granting the variance would not be detrimental or injurious 'to <br /> other property in the same area because the restaurant is located <br /> in a commercial shopping center complex and there are great <br /> distances between it and the closest residential property which <br /> could, be adversely affected. <br /> (2) It would be a hardship for the restaurant owners if the petition <br /> for the variance were denied because of the. shape of, the building <br /> and its location on a small site within the confines of a large <br /> shopping center, with two street frontages and accesses , and, most <br /> importantly , three entrances from the west, south, and east. <br /> (3) The conditions upon which the application was based are unique <br /> to this particular parcel of land because of the large exposure <br /> • of the property to the west, where the primary traffic is generat( <br /> from the east and south, making signage uniquely difficult for <br /> for this building and property. <br /> (4) The total signage for the existing signs on the building , as <br /> well as the requested sign , would be less than the permitted <br /> square footage for this building, and, in other respects, this <br /> property had been developed in accordance with all City and state <br /> codes and standards . <br /> (5) No one spoke in opposition to the request, either during the <br /> Planning Commission hearing , August 16 , 1983 , or the Council <br /> meeting held August 23rd. <br /> Motion carried unanimously . <br /> 6 <br /> Chair Makowske then reported the .justifications the Commission had <br /> cited for recommending the .additional lettering on the existing .TCF <br /> illuminated pylon sign -at- 3899 .Silver Lake . Road not be granted. <br /> ' e <br /> Dave. Shannon of American Sign and Indicator Corporation, 18725 Minne- <br /> tonka Boulevard, was present and apologized for not attending. the <br /> August .1.6th hearing and for. misunderstanding the "double negative" he <br /> perceives in the questions on the variance petition which should have <br /> been answered in the affirmative. He indicated TCF officials believe <br /> • they need to inform their own customers as well as those - from other t <br /> financial institutions that a 24 hour teller machine had been installeL <br /> for their convenience in the bank building. The sign company repre- <br /> sentative said he doesn' t believe the 13 additional square feet of <br />