Laserfiche WebLink
-7- <br /> Ordinance requirement for 30 foot front and sideyard setbacks on corner <br /> � lots which would' allow Mr. and Mrs . Donald Evertz to make a 10 ' X 10 ' <br /> addition to the west side of their existing home at 2901 St. Anthony <br /> Boulevard because the Planning Commission had believed they had insuf- <br /> ficient information to make any other decision. <br /> Mr. Evertz was present and told the Council his failure to attend the <br /> September 20th hearing was because no one had told him it was necessary <br /> for him to be there. He said the expansion is needed to provide a <br /> dining room large enough to seat 15 people at the same table on holidays <br /> and he guessed the only hardship he could plead was his inability to do <br /> this . The addition would be constructed to match the 10 foot pro- <br /> trusion of the existing garage on Coolidge, according to Mr. Evertz , <br /> and he had assumed that would require a three foot variance but could <br /> not be certain since Coolidge curves somewhat at that point. The <br /> petitioner pointed out the great distances between his home and his <br /> neighbor on Coolidge where an alley and a row of tall trees separate <br /> their properties . He said the curve in the street makes perfect <br /> alignment of homes on Coolidge impossible . <br /> Councilman Ranallo indicated a visit to the site had convinced him the <br /> proposed addition would certainly not adversely affect the appearance <br /> of the existing structure or block the visibility of any neighbor. <br /> He asked Commissioner Bjorklund what adverse effects he perceives for <br /> the addition. The Commissioner responded by saying he perceives the <br /> addition could create a visual hazard for drivers on that corner. <br /> • He reiterated his comments during the Commission hearing that from his <br /> personal association with that particular home he was convinced addi- <br /> tional space could be obtained by building off the breezeway or in <br /> another manner which would not require a variance . Mr. Evertz responded <br /> by telling the Commissioner three architects had told him this was <br /> the only,way he could get the additional room he needed. <br /> Bir. Childs indicated the drawing which had been submitted for both <br /> Council and Commission consideration had been drawn by him just to give <br /> the Commission some idea of what was actually being requested . <br /> Councilman Enrooth told Mr. Evertz that since those drawings were not <br /> to scale it was almost impossible for the Council to make a decision <br /> without knowing the exact dimensions of the variance. The Mayor <br /> suggested that if Mr. Evertz were unable to attend the next Council <br /> meeting, he should at least have his contractor present to give the <br /> exact size of the variance which is involved so the project won 't be <br /> delayed so long the construction can' t be started this construction <br /> season. Mr. Evertz indicated that suggestion would be acceptable to <br /> him and the matter .was deferred until the Council 's October 11th <br /> meeting. <br /> Councilman Marks reported his wife, who is associated with the emergency <br /> services for Metropolitan Hospital, had told him- the disaster drill <br /> which had. been conducted in St. Anthony September .19th had been con- <br /> sidered one of the -most unique drills held in the metropolitan area. <br /> The Mayor-said he::had been .present and observed. the high school -,stu- <br /> dents <br /> chool _.stu- <br /> dents involved 'had*-given .such convincing performances that even the <br /> neighbors-had, been .fooled: ' He - indicated he believed 'a vote of thanks <br /> was. due the.-City Fire Chief and his men. <br />