My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 10181983
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1983
>
PL PACKET 10181983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:30:57 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1983
SP Name
PL PACKET 10181983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br /> E21 Denying the request might place TCF in a competitive disadvantage <br /> w with other banking institutions who are not restricted as to the <br /> signage when advertising the new electronic developments in their <br /> field of enterprise. <br /> Voting on the motion : <br /> Aye : Bowerman, Wagner, and Franzese. <br /> Nay: Makowske. <br /> Abstention: Bjorklund <br /> Motion carried. <br /> The Manager indicated the Metro Council would be preparing a work . <br /> program for the City's Capital Improvement Plan and as well as a housing <br /> plan for which there would be no charge. <br /> Steve Yurick of Arkell Development and Gary Tushie of Saunders-Thalden <br /> Architects were present to report the revised proposal for the con- <br /> dominium, structure to be built under Phase 1 of the Kenzie Terrace <br /> Redevelopment Project for which they were seeking an amendment -to .the <br /> Phase 1 .Detailed P.U.D. Plan. Commission members were provided <br /> copies of the site and elevation plans and a solar graph showing the <br /> effect of the. higher building on the. adjoining property was presented <br /> at the meeting.. The original plans had been revised to provide two <br /> levels of parking, or one enclosed parking space per unit, because a <br /> • market survey of 114 persons who had indicated an interest in buying <br /> into the project had convinced the developers that the project would <br /> probably be marketable with only a one for one ratio of parking. _ The <br /> architect had redrawn the plans to provide an extra level of parking , <br /> one-quarter underground and three-quarters above ground, which, with <br /> the four levels of condominiums , would result in a 5-1/2 story building <br /> as compared to the 4-1/2 story structure approved for the P.U.D. In <br /> his letter to the four residents whose homes are directly behind the <br /> project property , which was hand delivered by the Manager that -day, <br /> Mr. Childs had told them the height of the structure would now be <br /> 49 feet to the eaves. of the pitch roof . Mr. Yurick confirmed that <br /> would change the height to 64 feet at the peak. <br /> Only one of the four property owners was present. for. the discussion <br /> that evening. Bernice Basara who lives directly behind the ,body shop <br /> parcel at 2608 - 27th Avenue N.E. indicated she was in favor of homes <br /> being constructed on the site since "they would be better- than what' s <br /> there now" . Her .only concern was that the higher building wouldn' t <br /> increase the shading of the alley in the winter, which becomes so <br /> icy driving is difficult. Mr. Tushie showed her on the. solar graphs . <br /> that the shadows cast by the building at their lowest point. in..early <br /> winter would never extend as far as those cast by the 30 foot ever- <br /> greens just across the. alley -from her property. <br /> The Manager. had talked.to_'tirs::'Wehr..who lives on the. end of -.that -block <br /> and she had ,not. indicated.:any major. problems- with. the revised proposal.. <br /> When Commissioner Bjor-rlund' asked Mrs . :.Basara if ..she knew why- the other <br /> neighbors weren't at-.:the meeting that evening, she told him-' Mr: Frederick <br /> had died, Monday and she- didn' t know what the other neighbor'.s reaction <br /> towards the development would be.: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.