My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 11201984
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1984
>
PL PACKET 11201984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:33:08 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:33:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1984
SP Name
PL PACKET 11201984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br /> • At 8:05 P.M:; the. Mayor Pro Tem opened the public-hearing on the 1985 City budget <br /> by 'reading the notice of the hearing which had been published in the September 25th <br /> Bulletin. Mr. Childs indicated he had received_ no written comments on the.-budget <br /> except the October 3rd letter from Chris Clausen, the Executive Director of the <br /> Northwest Suburban Youth .Service, related to the level of funding for his organi- <br /> zation, which had been included in the agenda packet. <br /> Mr. Childs had attached to his October 5th memorandum summarizing the $1 ,609,330 <br /> 1985 budget, charts illustrating the monetary effects the proposed tax levy of <br /> 12.674 mills would have on the average $80,000 home in St. Anthony as well as one <br /> whose market, value is $100,000, and documenting the primary reasons for increasing <br /> the taxes beyond the corresponding 4% budget increase, as being the 17.9% decrease <br /> in budgeted revenues from the liquor operation and a 9% drop in state aids since <br /> the 1983 allocation. <br /> As a point of reference for a discussion of Mr. Clausen' s letter, a copy of the <br /> Council 's April 10th minutes reporting on previous Council action related to the <br /> Youth Bureau funding had been included in the agenda packet. The minutes indicated <br /> the Council had at that time authorized City sponsorship of a federal grant under <br /> which youth intervention services were to continue to be provided in the City by <br /> the Youth Service Bureau at the same time the Council had agreed to give considera- <br /> tion at budget time to participation in a joint powers agreement with nine other <br /> suburban communities under which that service would be continued in 1985 at a cost <br /> to the City of 56,883, to be assessed on. a .per. capita basis. No formal request <br /> had been received in the interim and the funding was overlooked in the budget <br /> • process and not included in the tax levy. When this omission was brought to the <br /> Council 's attention' September. 25th, the decision had been to fund the service at <br /> a 51 ,500 level from the Council Contingency Fund, the general consensus being that <br /> the project should not automatically be funded each year, but rather treated like <br /> the Chemical Abuse Information Committee support and considered on an annual basis <br /> at budget time. <br /> When the head of the Youth Service Bureau had learned of the Council decision not to <br /> participate in the joint powers agreement, he wrote to the City officials indicat- <br /> ing the $1 ,500 level of funding would force his organization to discontinue their <br /> services to the City at the end of 1984. Mr. Clausen was present and amended his <br /> statement by saying that, rather than to force a hasty decision by the Council that <br /> evening, which he perceived could have an adverse effect on the City's young people, <br /> and taking full responsibility for not making a formal proposal as he had in the nine <br /> other suburban communities, the Bureau was prepared to "live with the amount you <br /> have allocated for 1985, with some adjustments in the level of service, as long as <br /> we don 't perceive a strong flavor on the Council against signing the joint. powers <br /> agreement later on, in which case the service could not be provided in 1985 for <br /> only a funding of $1 ,500. <br /> Mr. Clausen indicated St. Anthony is the only community in either Ramsey or <br /> Hennepin. -counties which hasn't funded youth intervention services. and he s.aid all <br /> the other'communities consider that expenditure to be money well spent to keep their <br /> young people out of health care, juvenile court, and welfare systems. The. Youth <br /> Bureau. official pointed out that, as indicated in his October 3rd letter, the <br /> Bureau had budgeted $21 ,000 for services they propose to provide the City for the <br /> • $6,881,investment, .with the difference being made up from other funding sources. <br /> In addition to the youth intervention services the City has now, St. Anthony would <br /> also be the beneficiary of three other programs extended to the other nine com- <br /> munities. These would be a youth employment service, a training program for school <br /> personnel to help troubled young people; and a unique program where the skills of <br /> the youths are utilized to aid senior citizens with their home chores. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.