My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 12111984
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1984
>
PL PACKET 12111984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:33:22 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:33:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1984
SP Name
PL PACKET 12111984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-7- <br /> I City to be not in conformance with the City Sign Ordinance and; because of the <br /> 2 controversy surrounding that sign, the Manager had -suggested •Mr. Jaeger first <br /> 3 discuss his plans--with the Commissioners- in an attempt to develop a sign which <br /> 4 would be acceptable to them. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Mr. Childs- told Commissioner Franzese it was' his understanding that the"; signage <br />{ 7 would no -longer be restricted by the Hedlund P.U.D. because the general consensus <br /> 8 of all concerned seemed to be that any business which replaced Craig & Company <br /> ti 9 in that building would have to have identification. <br /> 10 <br /> 1 <br /> 11 Mr. Jaeger reported that on October 24th, Gordy Hedlund had called him to indicate <br /> j 12 the property was for sale and when he had made the decision to open his shop at <br /> 13 that location, he had anticipated using the same signage which he has on his other <br /> 14 three shops in Fridley, Blaine and Coon .Rapids. When Commissioner Jones told the <br /> 1 15 applicant he found the sign depicted in the agenda packets, "offensive and not the <br /> 16 quality desired for the City, Mr. Jaeger responded by saying that sign was inferior <br /> a 17 to the one identifying his Blaine shop which had been reproduced, in what he per- <br /> 18 ceived to be an attractive manner, in a stain glass window on that facility. He <br /> 19 said he had already paid a large sum for the graphics and had hoped to utilize <br /> 20 them again for this shop. <br /> 21 <br /> A <br /> 22 Commissioner Bjorklund told the shop proprietor he hoped Mr. Jaeger realized the <br /> 23 only reason he was being considered for a free standing sign was because that type <br /> 24 of sign had been grandfathered in by the sign which originally stood in that <br />`! 25 same location, which the Commissioner added, had offended many in the community <br /> 26 because it had 'been lit all night and was perceived to be too large after it was <br /> • 27 once built. Commissioner Jones suggested Mr. Jaeger might get more community <br /> 28 support for his business by putting up a sign which more closely resembled some <br /> 29 of the more tastefully designed, substantially constructed monumental type signs <br /> 30 in that same area, and make sure his signage is turned off whenever the shop is <br /> 31 closed for business. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Mr. Jaeger was told the only reason Twin City Federal 's sign can be lit all night <br /> 34 is because they have a 24 hour banking service out of that building. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Although his shop is located across from Apache, Commissioner Franzese reminded <br /> 37 the beautician that he is also surrounded by residential dwellings and the type of <br /> 38 signage which had been developed for the townhomes just north of him as well as <br /> 39 the signs for the real estate office and Goodyear Tire and Rubber in the same <br /> 40 vicinity were suggested as models for his sign. Although there appeared to be a <br /> 41 general feeling of dislike for the faces depicted on the sign in the agenda packet, <br /> j <br /> 42 it was agreed the City could not control the signage to that extent. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Mr. Jaeger was asked to work with the City staff in designing the sign which could <br /> 45 be brought back to the Commission for final consideration during their next meet- <br /> 46 ing December 11th. Commissioner Bjorklund suggested it might be advantageous <br /> 47 for staff to photograph some of the more acceptable free standing signs around <br /> 48 the community and put them in a brochure which could be presented to future sign <br /> 49 applicants. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Motion by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Hansen to table the <br /> 52 application for signage for the Hair Station at 3909 Silver Lake Road until the <br /> 53 applicant is ready to present a firm proposal for that signage. <br /> F 54 <br /> E 55 Motion carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.