Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> • -13- <br /> --;he strongly recommended the Council -reinstate Article #14; because . <br /> --lie had no intention of voting for the -ordinance without it. <br /> Councilmember Enrooth stated that: <br /> he didn' t think the Council had been as concerned about minitrailers <br /> or small boats being parked on residential property .as they had .been <br /> about situations where a trailered 24 foot long "mini-cruiser'. is <br /> parked where the neighbors have to look. at it .from October through <br /> May; <br /> -he thought the 'Council really hadn' t known where to draw the line to <br /> mediate the problem; <br /> -he perceived there was a need to establish some sort of maximum; <br /> -as .he had indicated during, the April 28th meeting, he strongly that <br /> Article #14 with a specific number should be included; and' <br /> -he hadn' t changed his viewpoint on that since then. <br /> Councilmember Marks reported that during the 'time he was campaigning <br /> voters- had appeared to have the greatest concerns about a small number of <br /> unsightly yards 'where - parts of vehicles or construction equipment was <br /> left on lawns all year long. The -Councilmember said: <br /> -he had noticed for the first time one of his neighbors had a number <br /> of vehicles parked next to a woods and he perceived that homeowner <br /> should probably have .been at the meeting that night to protest what <br /> Article #14 would be doing to him; <br /> -he didn' t think the small boats people consider to be "symbols of <br /> affluence" were really the problems the ordinance was directed <br /> towards; <br /> -rather than restricting the number of vehicles to 4 to get at <br /> - unsightly construction equipment parked on residential property, <br /> thought the Council should be looking for ways. to specifically -address <br /> that type of violation. <br /> The Councilmember was told even the existing weight restrictions would <br /> not address some of the motorhomes neighbors have. to _put up with in , the <br /> yard next door_ since the ordinance exempts recreational vehicles. <br /> Councilmember. Makowske. 'said she - perceived the ordinance in its present <br /> form addressed , the specific problems of unsightliness, parking ruts in <br /> lawns, as .well as ,parts of vehicles laying all over front yards the <br /> Council was looking at. She. contended: <br />