My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06161987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 06161987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:34:54 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:34:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 06161987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`l <br /> • 1 -5- <br /> 3 structure was completely leveled and rebuilt. - .They .-had denied a <br /> 4 ``- new free-standing sign with : .=the understanding that Mr. Plaisted <br /> 5 wcould have' the rotating (non-conforming roof sign) - and one wall <br /> '6 sign ' . The property has two wall signs plus the roof sign and <br /> 7 the Commissioners find this to be in violation of the Sign <br /> 8 Ordinance. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Staff was asked to notify Mr. Plaisted of his sign violation and <br /> 11 to report back as to progress toward removal of the illegal sign. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 - KENZIE TERRACE PROJECT UPDATE <br /> 14 <br /> 15 The City Manager notified the Planning Commission about the <br /> 16current status of the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment - Project. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 *Arkand Partnership is in default on the redevelopment <br /> 19 agreement; <br /> 20 <br /> 21 *the City is seeking to replace them as developers; <br /> 22 <br /> 23 *the City ordered a market study to help in finding a new <br /> 24 redeveloper. That study shows that a market exists for . <br /> 25 only 100 to an absolute maximum of 150 units of new senior <br /> 26 rental units at the site; <br /> 7 <br /> 8 *recalculations of the tax increment also indicate that a <br /> 29 lower density, perhaps as low as 200 units, might be <br /> 30 possible; <br /> 31 <br /> 32 *it appears that a part senior rental ( 100-150 units) -part <br /> 33 commercial or townhouse project would not be feasible; <br /> 34 <br /> 35 *alternatives will be explored with the residents -in the <br /> 36 neighborhood and their input will be asked for in the near <br /> 37 future. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 The Planning Commission was of the consensus that this approach <br /> 40 seemed reasonable. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 ADJOURNMENT <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Motion by Wagner, seconded by Werenicz to adjourn the Planning <br /> 45 Commission meeting at 10: 15 P.M. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Motion carried. unanimously. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Respectfully submitted, <br /> 51 <br /> .52 David Childs, City Manager <br /> 3 <br /> 54 :cjk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.