My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 07181989
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1989
>
PL PACKET 07181989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:39:53 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:39:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1989
SP Name
PL PACKET 07181989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Chair Madden asked whether the library was required to obtain a variance • <br /> 2 for their two signs. Chair Madden expressed the opinion that the <br /> 3 petitioner was justified in comparing his store to -the library, and <br /> 4 that the owners of the shopping center might have made a better decision <br /> 5 had they wrapped the fascia around the side of the building. He had no <br /> 6 objection to the way the library signage was handled and would have no <br /> 7 objection to Mr. Peters' request if he were to handle it in the same <br /> 8 manner. <br /> 9 Commissioner Brownell asked whether any consideration had originally <br /> 10 been given to the fact that .the store is a corner location with traffic <br /> 11 from two directions. Acting City Manager VanderHeyden responded that <br /> 12 the corner location was one of the reasons stated for granting the <br /> 13 original variance. <br /> 14 Commissioner Hansen expressed the opinion that once the road past the <br /> 15 new apartments was completed and re-opened that it would accommodate a <br /> 16 substantial amount of traffic. He then questioned the reasoning of the <br /> 17 center owners in installing fascia around one corner of the building <br /> 18 and not around the other. <br /> 19 Commissioner Madden agreed that the owner's request was reasonable <br /> 20 because he was in a highly visible location. <br /> 21 Commissioner Hansen stated that he would be more in favor of the request <br /> 22 if it were actually identifying the business rather than advertising a <br /> 23 brand name. <br /> 24 Commissioner London opposed granting a variance on the grounds that he <br /> 25 felt no particular hardship existed, and that the petitioner had simply <br /> 26 made a poor business decision when selecting the signage for the front <br /> 27 of his business. <br /> 28 Commissioner Madden expressed the view that a reasonable compromise <br /> 29 could be for the petitioner to propose a small sign mentioning the word <br /> 30 "vacuums" on the part of the fascia that wraps around the canopy. <br /> 31 Commissioner London inquired whether a variance would be required in <br /> 32 that case, and Commissioner Hansen replied that the petitioner would <br /> 33 have to request a variance for two signs. <br /> 34 Commissioner Franzese proposed that the word "vacuums" might be added <br /> 35 to the signage on the front of the store rather than on the side. <br /> 36 Commissioner Brownell suggested that it might be to the petitioner's <br /> 37 advantage for the Commission to table his request in order to allow him <br /> 38 time to explore alternatives rather than to recommend denial of the <br /> 39 request.' <br /> 40 Chair Madden asked for reaction to his suggestion, which elicited <br /> 41 agreement from Commissioner Brownell. Commissioner London calculated • <br /> 42 that the petitioner could use approximately 30 square feet on the side <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.