PL PACKET 05151990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular Council Meeting April 24, 1990 page 3 1 were different than those she brought to the. Planning Commission meeting. 2 She stated that the major change in the plans was the distance from the 3 street to the garages. VanderHeyden indicated her concern with this con- 4 struction interfering with the public right-of-way. 5 6 The City Attorney reviewed the plans and felt he could not give a opinion 7 without knowing where the lots lines were . He suggested a survey should be 8 gotten of the parcel . 9 10 Councilmember Enrooth felt the Council should be making a decision on the 11 same plans the Planning Commission had viewed. Commissioner Hansen agreed 12 and noted that one of the concerns of the Planning Commission has been the safety 13 factor. Councilmember Enrooth noted that this type of situation had happened 14 before and felt it did a diservice to the Planning Commission. 15 16 Mayor Pro-tem Ranallo observed that the site lines of this home are in line 17 with those adjacent to it. 18 . 19 Councilmember Marks wondered if this changed plan could still answer the three 20 questions affirmatively of the Petition for Variance. 21 22 Ms. Zielinska again' stated her family's need for additional parking. The �3 family presently has four vehicles and she feels it is more unsafe for the • 24 area when any of the cars are parked on the boulevard.. 25 26 Councilmember Makowske inquired of Commissioner Hansen if he thought the �7 Planning Commission might have responded to this request differently if 28 it had these new plans and drawings. He said the concerns of the Planning �9 Commission and of the City staff focused on safety and public right-of-way. 30 He felt if the Planning Commission were to address this issue again it would 31 be very helpful to know exactly where the right-of-way is located. 32 33 Motion by Makowske, second by Marks to table this matter so- the Planning 34 Commission can take a second look at it. Councilmember Makowske suggested 35 that the changed plans and drawings be shown to the Planning Commission 36 and that the matter of the lot lines be reviewed. She suggested that Ms. 37 Zielinska meet with the City Manager who will obtain the survey showing 38 the lot lines. 39 40 Motion carried unanimously 2. Setback Variance Request James Pirino, 2917 33rd Avenue N.E. 43 44 Commissioner Hansen again stated that the minutes of the April 17, 1990 45 Planning Commission meeting accurately reflected the proceedings of the 45 meeting. . 47 Pirino stated his position, under the advise of legal counsel , that a variance 48 is not required. He is requesting a front yard variance of twenty feet from 49 the average front yard setback (53 feet, 4 inches) of the two adjacent pro- 50 perties.