My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 09171991
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1991
>
PL PACKET 09171991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:42:20 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:42:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1990-1991
SP Name
PL PACKET 09171991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'n thou <br /> . m <br /> ilia a AppROVAL : <br /> DATE : <br /> September 12, 1991 <br /> TO : <br /> Planning commission Members <br /> FROM : <br /> David Urbia, Management Assistant <br /> =TEM : G Preussner, 2917-31st Avenue N.E. Setback Request <br /> The applicant, Garret Preussner, is requesting a variance of 13 feet 3 inches to allow for a front <br /> yard setback of 40-feet (ordinance requires a minimum of 30-feet or equal to the average of the <br /> adjacent property) for the construction of an addition to the existing single family dwelling at 2917 <br /> 31st Avenue Northeast. <br /> The 40 yard setback for the existing structure is allowed as it has been "grandfathered." However, <br /> the proposed addition is subject to the provisions of the ordinance, which would require a 53 foot <br /> 3 inch front yard setback (as adjoining property is the average of 50' and 56.5') or a variance <br /> request. <br /> City staff asked the applicant if the addition could be placed on the back of the existing structure. <br /> The applicant stated that: (1) this would be difficult, if not impossible, to construct, and (2) the <br /> surrounding neighbors' lots are built up and drain into his backyard, hence an addition in the <br /> backyard could interfere with drainage. <br /> Public comment on this matter has been received. Concern about the completion of the exterior <br /> siding was given. Another concern (due to misunderstanding) was that the addition would be on <br /> the front of the house. This person would oppose the variance request if the addition were to be <br /> on the front, which it is not, therefore they support the variance request. Mr. Preussner stated that <br /> he spoke with his two adjacent neighbors, and they did not object to his proposed addition. <br /> City staff recommends the granting of the variance, under the condition that the entire siding and <br /> exterior remodeling be completed when the addition is completed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.