My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05171994
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1994
>
PL PACKET 05171994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:28:12 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:28:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1994
SP Name
PL PACKET 05171994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Planning Commission Minutes • <br /> 2 April 19, 1994 <br /> 3 Page 8 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 intend canopies to be billboards. Mr:Martin asked if this could be tabled until next <br /> 6 meeting.and he'd bring more information. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Chair Gondorchin asked the consensus of the other Commissioners regarding the concept. <br /> 9 Commissioners Bergstrom, Thompson, and Faust supported the concept. Commissioner <br /> 10 Horst stated he had a problem conceptually with the building itself and only 9-1/2 feet to the <br /> 11 property line,and the impact it would have on the neighbors. Mr. Hamer stated that mailings <br /> 12 had been sent to the neighbors and no one is at the meeting. Mr. Martin stated he had spoken <br /> 13 with the neighbors on both sides(the occupants, not the owners)and explained the proposed <br /> 14 landscaping and that they had no problems with it. Commissioner Horst again asked what <br /> 15 the variance should be based on. He asked Mr. Martin if there was any other design that <br /> 16 could be used here. Mr. Martin stated that they could draw plans based on the current <br /> 17 setbacks, and try to build within them, but it usually doesn't work. Commissioner Horst <br /> 18 stated that he would like to see that, that he doesn't have a problem with the front of the <br /> 19 property, but with the building being so near the back. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Commissioner Makowske agreed that a hardship other than economic must be proven to <br /> 22 approve the setback. Other than the question of hardship,he's in favor of the project. Mt. <br /> 23 Martin stated that the next set of drawings would have more detail. Chair Gondorchin asked • <br /> 24 if next month's appearance should be a concept review. Commissioner Faust is concerned <br /> 25 that the Commission not thwart the owner's efforts and he feels that the decision should be <br /> 26 made next time, rather than do a concept review. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Chair Gondorchin stated that he does not have as much of a problem with the size of the <br /> 29 . building as with whether or not the package is to the current standard. There is no strict <br /> 30 regulation as to how near it is to the lot line, especially with respect to granting.a variance. <br /> 31 Commissioner Horst questioned Mr. Martin as to standard sizes of convenience stores. Mr. <br /> 32 Martin reiterated that the general market currently has convenience stores at 3,000 feet. <br /> 33 Commissioner Horst asked if this was a realistic goal given the size of the lot, and Mr. <br /> 34 Martin stated yes. The Commissioners discussed Mr.Martin's difficult position speaking for <br /> 35 Mr. Olson,and the Commission making recommendations based on Mr. Martin's statements. <br /> 36 Mr. Hamer suggested Mr.Martin that Mr. Olson.should attend the May 17th meeting. There <br /> 37 was some question as to Mr. Olson possibly desiring 24 hour operation in the future. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Chair Gondorchin asked about the building size. He asked the Commissioners if there was <br /> 40 a size they had in mind. There was debate about different building sizes between 700 square <br /> 41 feet and the proposed 2,500 square feet. Commissioner Horst wondered how a variance <br /> 42 could be granted if there's no hardship and if there's nothing special about the lot. <br /> 43 Commissioner Makowske stated that technically the Commissioners could be liable for their <br /> 44 decision and had to have a good basis for that decision. Commissioner Bergstrom asked if • <br /> 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.