My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 01301996
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1996
>
PL PACKET 01301996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:31:18 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:31:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1996
SP Name
PL PACKET 01301996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The granting of a side yard variance for Lot 7 allows for the reasonable use and continued <br /> accessibility of the remaining mall, while also enabling planned redevelopment plans for the <br /> whole property to move forward. <br /> Duane Grace submitted a report to the City upon reviewing plans for the proposed partial <br /> demolition of norther portion of the existing mall involving the old J.C.Penney's store. In <br /> his report, Mr. Grace advised the City that according to the Uniform Building Code, a <br /> zero-lot line for the remaining mall building will be acceptable provided that 1.) a two- <br /> hour (2) fire rated area separation wall be constructed to replace that wall that is removed <br /> and that this wall be continued at right angles to the east and west of the exterior of the <br /> Cub Foods store for an additional five (5) feet in each direction; 2.) 60 feet of open area be <br /> maintained around Cub Foods store-and the remaining portion of the existing mall as is <br /> required, with the exception of northern wall; and 3.) that both buildings will maintain a <br /> fully automatic fire suppression systems. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the 10 foot side <br /> yard variance request made by Ste. Marie Corporation. If the variance is granted, it will <br /> not alter the essential character of the property or locality. The variance request was made <br /> for the purpose of enhancing the redevelopment of the property to return it to its <br /> reasonable and best use. <br /> Because the Ste. Marie Corporation acquired this property through the deed in lieu of <br /> foreclosure, they did not create the hardship that has caused them to request the side yard <br /> variance. While redeveloping this property is in their economic best interest, they also <br /> want to maintain most of the existing building to accommodate existing tenants. Granting <br /> the variance and allowing a phased redevelopment is also in the best economic interest of <br /> the remaining tenants. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.