Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes "Draft" <br /> September 21, 2004 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 1 stated that the owners have invested a lot of time and money into restoring the Bell Tower as they <br /> 2 also agree that these treasures should be kept and maintained. He stated that the Administration <br /> 3 Building would be difficult to add on to noting that they did try to replicate some of the character <br /> 4 from the building. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Commissioner Young agreed that this is a tricky issue when dealing with preservation when <br /> 7 trying to make a decision between a function and historic use. She noted the concern of the <br /> 8 building noting that the cast stone is monetary issue adding that this building presents the <br /> 9 presence of the complex and reviewed the area with the Commission. She noted the detailing <br /> 10 that has been included stating that it does speak nicely about what the buildings are trying to say. <br /> 11 She expressed concerns with respect to the materials they are proposing and the possible historic <br /> 12 issue with respect to the planning of the boulevard. She stated that losing the center grass <br /> 13 component could cause some concern. She acknowledged their research on the historic <br /> 14 significance of the area adding that this is an item, as a Commission,that they need to follow up <br /> 15 on. She stated that both the building and the landscaping should be considered. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Commissioner Young asked for clarification on the height of the building. Mr. Stoick stated that <br /> 18 the building is 31.6 feet in height noting that they did stay within the requirements of the ROS. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Chair Stromgren noted that the Commission does understand that they have unique elements to <br /> 21 deal with. He stated that he would not be that difficult to make the building more efficient and . <br /> 22 workable for other uses. He stated that they would like more proof that demolition of the <br /> 23 building is necessary. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Commissioner Young referenced the east side elevation and referenced the signs. Mr. Stoick <br /> 26 clarified stating that it is designed to be a fence or screen wall and reviewed with the <br /> 27 Commission. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 IX. PUBLIC INPUT <br /> 30 <br /> 31 NONE <br /> 32 <br /> 33 X. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 10.1 Silver Lake Village Development Update—Perry Thorvig DSU <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Perry Thorvig provided the Commission with an update on the developments in and adjacent to <br /> 38 the Silver Lake Village PUD project. He stated that there is considerable activity in the area <br /> 39 noting that they laid the first lift of asphalt, the liquor store will be opening soon, other buildings <br /> 40 and Wal-Mart are well into construction. He stated that it appears that some of the stores along <br /> 41 39th that will be open in November. He stated that they are not ready to name the tenants noting <br /> 42 that it is 95% full. He stated that he would like to update the Commission on the Equinox <br /> 43 Apartments, Wendy's and Applebee's. <br /> 44 <br />