Laserfiche WebLink
Library was published in the St. Anthony Bulletin on November 11, 2015. The required 30-day <br />comment period ended on December 9, 2015. <br /> <br />Comment letters were received from seven agencies; the Minnesota Department of Transportation, <br />the Minnesota Historical Society, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, the Rice Creek Watershed District, and <br />Ramsey County Public Works. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The City of St. Anthony Village has proposed to improve the quality of Mirror Lake, and <br />subsequently, downstream bodies of water through the excavation of phosphorus laden sediment <br />and soil, reconstruction of eroded shoreline, and establishment of a native vegetated buffer. The <br />project requires an EAW as defined by Part 4410.4300, Subpart 27, of State Rule. <br /> <br />The purpose of an EAW is to examine the anticipated environmental impacts of a project and <br />determine if the project will have the potential for significant environmental effects. If it is <br />determined that there is no potential for significant environmental effects, a negative declaration is <br />issued. If it is determined that there is the potential for significant environmental effects, a more <br />detailed environmental review in the form of an Environmental Impact Statement must be ordered. <br /> <br />Comment letters were received from: 1) the Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2) the <br />Minnesota Historical Society, 3) the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 4) the Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency, 5) the Metropolitan Council, 6) Rice Creek Watershed District, and 7) <br />Ramsey County Public Works. A summary of the comments and responses are included in the <br />Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision document (Attachment 2). <br /> <br />After considering the anticipated environmental impacts outlined in the EAW; the required <br />mitigation measures identified in the EAW to address potential public waters and wildlife resources <br />impacts; comments received from the reviewing agencies; and the responses to the comments; staff <br />has determined that there is no potential for significant environmental effects associated with the <br />improvements included in the Mirror Lake Improvements EAW if construction phasing and <br />mitigation measures detailed in the EAW and comment responses are followed. Project site plans <br />will incorporate the mitigation measures identified in the EAW; therefore no Environmental Impact <br />Statement is necessary. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Todd Hubmer, PE <br />City Engineer <br /> <br />32