My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 08312015
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2015
>
CC WORKSESSION 08312015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 11:40:19 AM
Creation date
1/27/2016 11:39:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Update for 1,4-Dioxane Water Supply and Treatment Feasibility Study <br />August 31, 2015 <br /> <br />WSB is currently studying alternative water supply and treatment options to address 1,4-dioxane that has <br />been detected in the City’s wells. Dioxane is an additive found in solvents that were used at the Twin <br />Cities Army Ammunition Plant in Arden Hills. Technological advances have resulted in better methods <br />for detecting contaminants at extremely low concentrations. The test results by the Minnesota <br />Department of Health (MDH), and independently verified by the City, have shown the presence of 1,4- <br />dioxane (dioxane) in the City’s wells. The concentrations have ranged from 0.35 parts per billion (ppb) in <br />Well No. 3 to 1.5 ppb in Well No. 4. The concentrations detected in Well No. 4 have increased over the <br />period of testing. A regulatory limit on the amount of dioxane permitted in drinking water has not yet <br />been set under the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The MDH, however, has set a guidance limit of 1 <br />part per billion (ppb) for 1,4-dioxane based on its potential to cause cancer in people. WSB is currently <br />evaluating each of the following proposed water supply and treatment options and estimate the capital and <br />long term operational costs for each option. <br />Option 1 - Blend City wells to dilute 1,4-dioxane to below the MDH guidance limit <br />More water would be pumped from either Well No. 3 or Well No. 5 to dilute the 1,4-dioxane <br />concentration in Well No. 4 to below 1 ppb at the point of entry (plant effluent). Well No. 3 contains the <br />highest trichloroethylene (TCE) concentration. The existing carbon filters would require more frequent <br />change outs if this well is run more frequently. <br /> <br />Option 2 - Construct deeper Mount-Simon Hinckley wells <br />A moratorium exists in the Metro Area for using the Mount-Simon Hinckley formation. The <br />Commissioner of the DNR may allow use of this aquifer only if no other feasible alternatives exist. <br />Water from this aquifer commonly contains radium 226+228. Although radium could be treated with the <br />existing greensand filters, the filter media could become a hazardous waste because of the radium build- <br />up on the filter media. Pumping costs would also be higher because the static water levels are deeper in <br />the Mount-Simon Hinckley formation. <br /> <br />Option 3 – Purchase water from St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPWRS) via the City of Roseville’s <br />water distribution system <br />WSB has made contact with Roseville staff and they are currently analyzing this option from their side. <br />SPRWS’s water rates are $4.04 per 1,000 gallons during the winter and $4.20 per 1,000 gallons during <br />the summer with a minimum monthly base fee of $4.80. Wholesale water rates had not been obtained <br />from SPRWS at the time of this memo. <br /> <br />Option 4 – Purchase water from Minneapolis <br />Although Minneapolis’ water rates are significantly higher that the City’s, their whole sale rate would be <br />only $2.73 per 1,000 gallons. However, this cost does not include maintenance costs for the City’s <br />watermains, water towers, water meters, labor, etc. These costs need to be figured-in to the analysis to <br />make a true comparison of the water rates. A water booster station or pressure reducing station and a <br />metering vault could also be required with this option. <br /> <br />Option 5 – Implement a water treatment system for 1,4-dioxane at the City’s water treatment plant <br />WSB is currently studying treatment options for 1,4-dioxane. The most feasible treatment options have <br />been narrowed down to Ultra Violet (UV) Light with Hydrogen Peroxide and Ozone with Hydrogen <br />Peroxide. Trojan Technologies is currently piloting UV/Hydrogen Peroxide at the water treatment plant. <br />The pilot water is also being spiked with excess 1,4-dioxane to account future conditions that might <br />occur. <br /> <br />These options will be presented and discussed in more detail by WSB at the August 31, 2015 work <br />session. <br /> <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.