My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 12142015
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2015
>
CC WORKSESSION 12142015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2016 11:51:25 AM
Creation date
1/27/2016 11:49:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />o Although the concentrations are less than the MCL, Minneapolis’ water <br />contains higher levels of disinfection byproducts (Haloacetic Acids, Total <br />Trihalomethanes, etc.) than the water distributed by the City of St. <br />Anthony Village. <br /> <br />o Minneapolis’ water is supplied from surface water, meaning the influent <br />water quality has potential to fluctuate throughout the course of a year. In <br />the spring time during snowmelt and in the summer time during algae <br />blooms, the water quality within the Mississippi River can produce higher <br />levels of taste and odor compounds. <br /> <br />5. The potential exists for hazardous materials to spill into the Mississippi River, <br />either from tanker trucks, rail cars, storm sewers or other sources along the river. <br /> <br />6. The age and redundancy of the Minneapolis Water distribution system is of <br />concern. The utility contains hundreds of miles of old steel pipe that is yet to be <br />lined or replaced. These maintenance costs may increase the future cost of <br />Minneapolis Water. <br /> <br />7. Minneapolis Water most likely has concerns with the long term reliability of the <br />Mississippi River as its water source. They are currently considering <br />implementing back-up groundwater wells for its surface water supply. In the <br />event o f a historic drought or an intentional or unintentional contamination event, <br />the utility would likely not have enough backup capacity in their groundwater <br />wells to continue to serve all of its customers. <br /> <br />8. The City’s existing water rates would increase. The City would need to collect <br />enough revenue from water users in the City to cover the cost of purchasing water <br />from Minneapolis Water as well as to maintain its own existing water distribution <br />system (such as the water tower, watermains, hydrants, meters) within the City. <br /> <br />9. At least two watermain connect ions, two booster stations, and 20-inch watermain <br />would need to be constructed across St. Anthony Village to provide redundancy <br />in case one of the watermains broke or required maintenance. <br /> <br />10. The City would spend in excess of $17 million over 20 years to purchase water <br />from Minneapolis Water. <br /> <br />Estimated Capital and Long Term O&M Costs <br />Estimated capital and long term O&M costs were based on present worth analysis on the <br />assumption that a new 20-inch watermain would need to be installed from two of the <br />potential connection points defined by Minneapolis Water to the existing St. Anthony <br />Village water tower, running approximately 15,000-feet in length. <br /> <br />Due to the difference in the hydraulic grade lines (ground elevation plus water pressure) <br />between the two water distribution systems, two booster pump stations would be required <br /> <br />1,4-DIOXANE PROJECT <br />FEASIBILITY REPORT <br />CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE <br />WSB PROJECT NO. 3183-00 PAGE 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.