Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />The St. Anthony Village City Council authorized WSB & Associates, Inc. to study the <br />available options to address 1,4-Dioxane (Dioxane) that has been detected in the City’s <br />water supply and provide a long term, reliable source of potable water that meets all the <br />recommended State and Federal health guidelines. This Feasibility Report summarizes <br />these options. There may be sources of third-party funding to pay for some or all of the <br />costs associated with remedial action to address the Dioxane contamination. This <br />Feasibility Report does not attempt to assess the likelihood or scale of such funding, and <br />does not evaluate remedial options based on funding source or amount. <br /> <br />Dioxane has been detected in the City’s three drinking water wells since March 2015, <br />likely emanating from the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant in Arden Hills (TCAAP). <br />Dioxane is used to stabilize chlorinated solvents and can be found in personal care <br />products, laundry detergents, and food in small amounts. TCAAP used Dioxane as an <br />additive in the solvents used at the facility. Other contaminants from TCAAP have been <br />detected since the early 1980s in the aquifers supplying groundwater for the City. In <br />contrast, Dioxane was recently classified as an emerging contaminant by the <br />Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and testing for Dioxane in the aquifers below <br />the City first occurred in March 2015. <br /> <br />This report summarizes five options that were selected for analysis as possible means to <br />address Dioxane in the City’s drinking water: <br /> <br />• Option 1 – Blend the existing wells; <br />• Option 2 – Construct deeper Mount -Simon Hinckley wells; <br />• Option 3 – Purchase water from Minneapolis Water; <br />• Option 4 – Purchase water from St. Paul Regional Water; and <br />• Option 5 – Implement treatment to remove Dioxane. <br /> <br />During initial screening, Options 1 and 4 were determined to be either ineffective and/or <br />clearly inferior to other measures, and were therefore not analyzed in detail. Costs were <br />evaluated for Options 2, 3, and 5 as these were the options that were determined to be <br />most feasible. A 3.5% inflation rate was assumed for the O&M costs to match other <br />programs within the City. The total estimated 20-year capital cost s and operation and <br />maintenance costs for each of these options is as follows: <br /> <br />Option <br />Estimated <br />Capital <br />Cost <br /> <br /> <br />Finance <br />Cost <br />(4% <br />Interest) <br />Estimated 20- <br />Year O&M <br />Cost <br />(3.5% inflation <br />rate) <br /> <br />20-Year Cost <br />of <br />Purchasing/ <br />Producing <br />Water <br />Estimated <br />Total 20- <br />Year Cost <br />2 $7,115,600 $3,356,000 $2,812,300 $4,954,000 $18,237,900 <br />3 $9,480,300 $4,471,200 $4,487,800 $17,472,000 $35,911,300 <br />5 $7,177,600 $3,385,200 $1,080,200 $4,954,000 $16,597,000 <br /> <br />1,4-DIOXANE PROJECT <br />FEASIBILITY REPORT <br />CITY OF ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE <br />WSB PROJECT NO. 3183-00 PAGE 1