CC MINUTES 07121977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Councilman Sundland felt the Police Department would continue to use the good judgement they now demonstrate in enforcement of City ordin- ances and the Mayor said he saw the new ordinance as giving the police "a handle on keeping the peace" and said it would be an easy matter to immediately withdraw the new regulations if City personnel should become indiscriminate regarding its use. Motion by Councilman Sundland and seconded by Councilman Sauer to waive further readings and adopt Ordinance 1977-009. ORDINANCE 1977-009 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION; AMENDING CHAPTER IX OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 970 THERETO Voting on the motion: Aye : Sundland, Sauer and Miedtke Nay: Haik and Stauffer Motion carried. Motion by councilman Sauer and seconded by Councilman Haik to adopt the • ordinance which amends restrictions of use of trucks on City streets. ORDINANCE 1977-011 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF TRUCKS ON CITY STREETS; AMENDING SEC- TION 730: 00 OF THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES Motion carried unanimously. Action on the Hedlund Concept Development Plan for a P.U.D. had been tabled June 28th for further study and reaction from the Council and staff. Gordon Hedlund, his attorney, John Daubney and planner consul- tant, Carl Dale, were present for the consideration of the July 7th revision of the Plan which had been complied by Jim Fornell from changes suggested by the Council and staff. Mr. Fornell 's cover memor- andum of the same date presented Mr. Hedlund's concerns about the re- visions as well as his own recommendations on necessary Council action for dealing with the nonconforming percentages of commercial development contained in the Hedlund Plan. Council members were also provided a copy of Councilman Stauffer ' s June 29th memo regarding the "architec- turally designed" styling for the "C" and "B" development of the Plan and Jim Fornell answered her concerns regarding the clarity of or policy inherent in three provisions in the proposal in his July 12th memoran- dum. Councilman Haik and Councilman Sundland were adamant that a performance bond should be required for the entire project, but the latter felt he could vote for the Plan as long as restaurants were included in the (2)