My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 11151977
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1977
>
CC MINUTES 11151977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2016 3:12:51 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:59:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> November 15, 1977 <br /> The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hiebel at 7: 30 P.M. <br /> Present for roll call : Bowerman, Rymarchick, Hiebel, Klick and Le- <br /> tourneau <br /> Absent: Cowan and Marks <br /> Also present: Jim Fornell, City Manager <br /> Motion by Mr. Bowerman and seconded by Mr. Rymarchick to approve the <br /> minutes for the October 18, 1977 Planning Board meeting as presented. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by Mr. Rymarchick and seconded by Mr. Letourneau to approve the <br /> • minutes of the Special Board meeting held November 1, 1977 as presented. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Letourneau was designated to represent the Board at the next Council <br /> meeting. <br /> Mr. Marks arrived at 7: 33 P.M. at which time Mr. Hiebel opened the <br /> Public Hearing to consider a request from Peter S. Cartwright for a <br /> variance to the sideyard requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance for <br /> a basement addition to his home at 3423 Maplewood Drive. <br /> The Manager confirmed that all requirements pursuant to holding such a <br /> hearing had been met including that of notification and there was no one <br /> present who indicated a failure to receive such notification nor who <br /> objected to the contents of the notice. <br /> Mr. Cartwright explained that, after he had gotten a building permit for <br /> the 236 square foot addition he proposes to build under the existing <br /> sun deck, he became concerned about its proximity to the property line <br /> and had the property re-surveyed. This resulted in a finding that the <br /> original survey had been in error and rather than the northernmost point <br /> of the house (before the sun ,deck was added) being over ten feet from <br /> the property line, his sideyard is actually so close to the property <br /> line that the proposed addition will bring him within one foot of the <br /> • line at that point. The sun deck which he has dismantled for the con- <br /> struction was actually encroaching on the adjacent property and when <br /> 1 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.